The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs — John Shaqi
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
It is quite clear, therefore, that the Ancient Egyptians realised the
importance of desiccation as an essential element in the preservation of
the body. Moreover, they were familiar with a number of different means
of ensuring this end:—(1) by burial in dry sand; (2) by exposure to the
sun’s rays; (3) by removing all the softer and more putrescible parts of
the body; (4) possibly by massaging and squeezing out the juices from the
body; (5) by the free use of alcohol (palm wine) and large quantities of
powdered wood; and (6) by the aid of fire.
Dr. Alan Gardiner tells me that the most ancient Egyptian writings,
such, for example, as the Pyramid texts, afford positive evidence that
the Egyptians recognised the fact of the desiccation of the body in the
process of embalming, for their scribes tell us, in the most definite
manner, that the aim of the ceremony of offering libations was magically
to restore to the body (as represented by the statue above ground) the
fluids it had lost during embalming (Blackman, =5=).
If then the Egyptians of the Pyramid Age recognised the importance of
restoring the fluids to reanimate the mummy or its statue, it is quite
clear they must have appreciated the physical fact that their process of
preservation was largely a matter of desiccation.
It is a point of some interest and importance to note in this connection
that the essential processes of mummification—(1) salting, (2)
evisceration, (3) drying, and (4) smoking (or even cooking)—are identical
with those adopted for the preservation of meat, and (5) the use of honey
is analogous to the means taken to preserve fruit. In fact, the term used
by Herodotus for the first stage of the Egyptian process of mummification
is the term used for salting fish. It would be instructive to enquire
in what measure these two needs of primitive man in North-East Africa
mutually influenced one another, and led to an acquisition of knowledge
useful to them for the preservation both of their food and their dead
relatives!
To the constituent elements of the “heliolithic” culture may now be added
the practices of anointing with oil or unguents, the burning of incense
and the offering of libations, all derived from the ritual of embalming.
In considering the southern extension of Egyptian influence it must be
remembered that as early “as 2600 B.C. the Egyptian had already begun the
exploitation of the Upper Nile and had been led in military force as far
as the present Province of Dongola” (=62=, p. 23). For several centuries
Nubia and the Soudan were left very much to themselves. Then during the
time of the Middle Kingdom Egypt once more exerted a powerful influence
to the South. At the close of that period Egypt was overrun by the Hyksos.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account