The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs — John Shaqi
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
There has been considerable controversy as to the origin of the vast
stone monuments in this region. The writer from whom I have just quoted,
with many others, believed the Zimbabwe ruins to be the work of Early
Sabæan or Phœnician immigrants, who were attracted by the Rhodesian
gold-fields. Randall-MacIver believed that he found Chinese and Persian
relics (no earlier than the 14th or at earliest 13th century) under the
foundations; and recklessly jumped to the conclusion that the local
Negroes had conceived and built these vast monuments! The idea of any
savage people, and especially Negroes, planning such structures and
undertaking the enormous labour of their construction is surely too
ludicrous to be considered seriously. Even if these monuments were built
no earlier than five or six centuries ago, that does not invalidate
the hypothesis that they were inspired by the models of some old
civilization. Is it necessary to expound the whole theory of survivals
to make this point clear? The whole of this memoir is concerned with the
persistence in outlying corners of the world of strange practices whose
inventors passed away twenty-eight centuries and more ago, and whose
country has forgotten them and their works for more than a thousand
years. [My friend, W. J. Perry, is collecting other evidence which proves
quite definitely that the Zimbabwe culture was “heliolithic.”]
In Moll’s History (=46=) the following passage occurs in an account of
the customs of Ceylon, p. 430, “when a person of condition dies his
corps is laid out and wash’d, and being cover’d with a linnen-cloath, is
carried out upon a bier to some high place and burnt: but if he was an
officer who belong’d to the court, the corps is not burnt till the king
gives orders for it, which is sometimes a great while after. In this case
his friends hollow the body of a tree, and having bowell’d and embalm’d
the corps, they put it in, filling the hollow up with pepper, and having
made it as close as possible, they bury the corpse in some room of the
house till the king orders it to be burnt.”
“As for the poorer people, they usually wrap them up in mats and bury
them.”
This traveller’s tale would not call for serious attention if it were not
confirmed by modern accounts of an analogous practice in Burma and the
neighbourhood.
In his “Himalayan Journal” Sir Joseph Hooker described how the Khasias
temporarily embalm their dead in honey before cremating them.
Pettigrew (=56=, p. 245) quotes Captain Coke’s account of the embalming
of a Burman priest. The body, as witnessed by him, was lying exposed to
public view upon a stage constructed of bamboos. This is the bier which
is so invariably associated with mummification.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account