The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
But it is not merely the identity of structure and the geographical
distribution (in most cases along continuous coast-lines or related
islands) that proves the common origin of megalithic monuments. It
is further strongly corroborated by a remarkable series of beliefs,
traditions and practices, many of them quite meaningless and
unintelligible to us, which are associated with such structures wherever
they are found. Stories of dwarfs and giants (=13=), the belief in
the indwelling of gods or great men in the stones, the use of these
structures in a particular manner for certain special councils (=20=, pp.
64 and 65), and the curious, and, to us, meaningless, practice of hanging
rags on trees in association with such monuments (=20=, pp. 63 and 64).
In reference to the last of these associated practices, Lane Fox remarks,
“it is impossible to believe that so singular a custom as this could have
arisen independently in all these countries.”
In an important article on “Facts suggestive of prehistoric intercourse
between East and West” (_Journ. Anthr. Inst._, Vol. 14, 1884, p. 227),
Miss Buckland calls attention to a remarkable series of identities of
customs and beliefs, and amongst them certain legends concerning the
petrification of _dance maidens_ associated with stone circles as far
apart as Cornwall and Peru.
Taking all of these facts into consideration, it is to me altogether
inconceivable how any serious enquirer who familiarises himself with the
evidence can honestly refuse to admit that the case for the spread of
the inspiration to erect megalithic monuments from one centre has been
proved by an overwhelming mass of precise and irrefutable data. But this
evidence does not stand alone. It is linked with scores of other peculiar
customs and beliefs, the testimony of each of which, however imperfect
and unconvincing some scholars may consider it individually, strengthens
the whole case by cumulation; and when due consideration is given to
the enormous complexity and artificiality of the cultural structure
compounded of such fantastic elements, these are bound to compel assent
to their significance, as soon as the present generation of ethnologists
can learn to forget the meaningless fetish to which at present it bends
the knee.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account