The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
The Indonesian methods of preserving the dead are found in Seram (W. J.
Perry), and the report recently published by Lorenz[16] (=43=, p. 22)
records a similar practice in the neighbourhood of Doré Bay in North-West
New Guinea. The corpse was tied to the rafter of the dwelling-house; and
the practice of mixing the juices of decomposition with the food is in
vogue also. The accounts given by D’Albertis (=1=) and other travellers
show that analogous customs are found at other places in New Guinea.
There can be no doubt that the practice spread along the north coast of
the island and then around its eastern extremity to reach the islands of
the Torres Straits, where the practice is seen in its fully developed
form, as Flower (=19=), Haddon and Myers (=25=), and Hamlyn-Harris (=27=)
have described.
As I have already referred to Papuan mummies earlier in this
communication and at some future time intend to devote a special memoir
to the full discussion of the methods of the Torres Straits embalmers, I
shall not go into the matter in detail here. I should like, however, to
call special attention to the admirable account given by Haddon and Myers
(=25=) of the associated funeral rites.
In his memoir Flower described two interesting mummies, then in the
Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons in London, one “brought in 1872
from Darnley Island in Torres Strait by Mr. Charles Lemaistre, Captain
of the French barque ‘Victorine,’ and the other, an Australian mummy,
obtained in 1845 near Adelaide, by Sir George Grey.” By a curious and
utterly incomprehensible act of vandalism these extremely rare and
priceless ethnological specimens were deliberately destroyed by Sir
William Flower, who naively explains his extraordinary action by the
statement “as the skeleton will form a more instructive specimen when the
dried and decaying integuments are removed I have had it cleaned” (p.
393)! He treated in the same manner the second mummy, the only example
of its kind, so far as I am aware, in this country! His photographs
show that these two specimens, so far from being “decaying,” were in
a remarkably good state of preservation at the time he doomed them to
destruction.
Captain Lemaistre found the Torres Strait mummy “in its grave, which
consisted of a high straw and bamboo hut of round form: it was not lying
down, but standing up on the stretcher” (=19=, p. 389). This is a close
parallel to the African customs—mummification, burial in a house of round
form, and fixing the corpse to a rough form of funeral bier, which is
stood up in the house.
The skin was painted red, the scalp black. “The sockets of the eyes were
filled with a dark brown substance, apparently a vegetable gum.... In
this was imbedded a narrow oval piece of mother of pearl, pointed at each
end, in the centre of the anterior surface of which is fixed a round mass
of the same resinous substance, representing the pupil of the eye” (p.
301).
“Both nostrils had been distended.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account