The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
“Perhaps other black tribes may be discovered upon a more careful
enquiry, and if the theory of Crawford be accepted, which represents
the inhabitants of Polynesia in Ante-historic times as being a great
semi-civilized nation who had made some progress in agriculture and
understood the use of gold and iron, were clothed ‘with a fabric made of
the fibrous bark of plants which they wove in the loom,’ and had several
domesticated animals, a new and unexpected light may possibly be thrown
upon the origin of primitive American culture. It is certain that massive
ruins and remains of pyramidal structures and terraced buildings closely
analogous to those of India, Java and Cambodia, as well as to those of
Central America, Mexico and Peru, exist in many islands of Polynesia,
such as the Ladrone Islands, Tahiti, Fiji, Easter Island and the Sandwich
Islands, and the customs of the Polynesians are almost all of them found
to exist also amongst the American races.”
“Perhaps here, then, we have the ‘missing link’ between the Old World
civilizations and the mysterious civilizations of America.”
SUMMARY.
Between 4000 B.C. and 900 B.C. a highly complex culture compounded of a
remarkable series of peculiar elements, which were associated the one
with the other in Egypt largely by chance, became intimately interwoven
to form the curious texture of a cult which Brockwell has labelled
“heliolithic,” in reference to the fact that it includes sun-worship,
the custom of building megalithic monuments, and certain extraordinary
beliefs concerning stones. An even more peculiar and distinctive feature,
genetically related to the development of megalithic practices and
the belief that human beings could dwell in stones, is the custom of
mummification.
The earliest known Egyptians (before 4000 B.C.) practised weaving and
agriculture, performed the operation of “incision” (the prototype of
complete circumcision), and probably were sun-worshippers. Long before
3400 B.C. they began to work copper and gold. By 3000 B.C. they had begun
the practice of embalming, making rock-cut tombs, stone superstructures
and temples. By the mere chance that the capital of the united Kingdom
of Egypt happened to be in the centre of serpent-worship (and the
curious symbolism associated with it—Sethe, =74=), the sun, serpent and
Horus-hawk (the older symbol of royalty) became blended in the symbol of
sun-worship and as the emblem of the king, who was regarded as the son of
the sun-god.
The peculiar beliefs regarding the possibility of animate beings dwelling
in stone statues (and later even in uncarved columns), and of human
beings becoming petrified, developed out of the Egyptian practices of the
Pyramid Age (circa 2800 B.C.).
By 900 B.C. practically the whole of the complex structure of the
“heliolithic” culture had become built up and definitely conventionalized
in Egypt, with numerous purely accidental additions from neighbouring
countries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account