But Rhoda, who mistrusted Lady Sarah as strongly as she trusted her
husband, thought that the clever little lady, who had certainly
succeeded in throwing dust in Sir Robert’s eyes before her marriage,
was quite capable of having deceived him by a trick. How it was
managed the girl could not quite understand; but she felt sure that
Jack, having been concerned in the death of Langford, was the man with
the wounded hand whom she saw on his way upstairs; and she believed
that the wound had been received in a struggle with the poor butler,
and that, in order to avoid bringing suspicion upon himself, the young
man had been artful enough to conceal his injury until the following
day, when, taking an opportunity when there were several people
present, he had thrust his wounded hand through the window as if by
accident, and led those present to believe that the cut was freshly
made.
Some such trick as this Rhoda felt sure had been played, but it
sickened her to think that, in that case, Lady Sarah must have been a
party to the stratagem, by which Jack shielded himself and deceived
Sir Robert at the same time.
What was the whole truth concerning that night? Rhoda wondered.
It was now quite clear to her that, by accident or by design, it was
Jack Rotherfield who caused the death of the butler. If it was an
accident, why had he not told the truth about the night’s events? If
it was more than that, what was the reason of his quarrel with the
servant?
Certain dark suggestions did pass through her mind, but she would not
encourage them. The thing was a mystery, an ugly mystery, and the
ugliest part of it undoubtedly was that Lady Sarah was evidently in
the confidence of the young man, and that he and she were still
engaged together in practising a deception upon the lady’s husband.
Rhoda shuddered at the thought.
If Lady Sarah could deceive her trusting and indulgent husband to the
extent of keeping such a secret from his ears for ten years, how was
it possible to believe that she did not deceive him even farther?
The best thing to be said for the volatile beauty that her friendship
with Jack Rotherfield was perfectly open, that he was constantly the
guest of her husband, who certainly had no doubts of the loyalty
either of his wife or of his late ward.
Why, therefore, Rhoda told herself, should she worry herself about the
matter, since Sir Robert did not?
But argue as she might, she knew that there was more in the story than
had become known; and while refusing to believe that even the artful
Lady Sarah could go the length of wronging the man who trusted her so
nobly she knew that the wife was lacking in sterling loyalty, and
that, while she might be, and probably was, careful of herself and of
her position, she bestowed more confidence upon Jack Rotherfield, if
she did not more affection, than she gave to her own husband.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account