The Mind and the Brain: Being the Authorised Translation of L'Âme et le CorpsBinet, Alfred
Philosophy
The Mind and the Brain: Being the Authorised Translation of L'Âme et le Corps
Binet, Alfred
Mind and body
There must therefore exist, though unperceived by our senses, a sort
of kinship between the qualities of the external objects and the
vibrations of our nerves. This is sometimes forgotten. The theory of
the specific energy of the nerves causes it to be overlooked. As we
see that the quality of the sensation depends on the nerve that is
excited, one is inclined to minimise the importance of the excitant.
It is relegated to the position of a proximate cause with regard to
the vibration of the nerve, as the striking of a key on the piano is
the proximate cause of the vibration of a string, which always gives
the same degree of sound whether struck by the forefinger or third
finger, or by a pencil or any other body. It will be seen at once that
this comparison is inexact. The specific property of our nerves does
not prevent our knowing the form of the excitant, and our nerves are
only comparable to piano strings if we grant to these the property of
vibrating differently according to the nature of the bodies which
strike them.
How is it that the nerve wave, if it be the depository of the whole of
the physical properties perceived in the object, resembles it so
little? It is because--this is my hypothesis--these properties, if
they are in the undulation, are not there alone. The undulation is the
work of two collaborators: it expresses both the nature of the object
which provokes it and that of the nervous apparatus which is its
vehicle. It is like the furrow traced in the wax of the phonograph
which expresses the collaboration of an aerial vibration with a
stylus, a cylinder, and a clock-work movement. This engraved line
resembles, in short, neither the phonographic apparatus nor the aerial
vibration, although it results from the combination of the two.
Similarly, I suppose that if the nervous vibration resembles so little
the excitant which gives it birth, it is because the factor nervous
system adds its effect to the factor external object. Each of these
factors represents a different property: the external object
represents a cognition and the nervous system an excitement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account