The Mind and the Brain: Being the Authorised Translation of L'Âme et le CorpsBinet, Alfred
Philosophy
The Mind and the Brain: Being the Authorised Translation of L'Âme et le Corps
Binet, Alfred
Mind and body
[Footnote 4: J. S. MILL, _An Examination of Sir Wm. Hamilton's
Philosophy_, pp. 5 and 6. London. 1865.]
[Footnote 5: A few subtle philosophers have returned to it, as I shall
show later in chapter iv.]
[Footnote 6: Thus, the perplexity in which John Stuart Mill finds
himself is very curious. Having admitted unreservedly that our
knowledge is confined to sensations, he is powerless to set up a
reality outside this, and acknowledges that the principle of causality
cannot legitimately be used to prove that our sensations have a cause
which is not a sensation, because this principle cannot be applied
outside the world of phenomena.]
[Footnote 7: See p. 18, _sup_.--ED.]
CHAPTER III
THE MECHANICAL THEORIES OF MATTER ARE ONLY SYMBOLS
If we keep firmly in mind the preceding conclusion--a conclusion which
is neither exclusively my own, nor very new--we shall find a certain
satisfaction in watching the discussions of physicists on the essence
of matter, on the nature of force and of energy, and on the relations
of ponderable and imponderable matter. We all know how hot is the
fight raging on this question. At the present time it is increasing in
intensity, in consequence of the disturbance imported into existing
theories by the new discoveries of radio-activity.[8] We psychologists
can look on very calmly at these discussions, with that selfish
pleasure we unavowedly feel when we see people fighting while
ourselves safe from knocks. We have, in fact, the feeling that, come
what may from the discussions on the essence of matter, there can be
no going beyond the truth that matter is an excitant of our nervous
system, and is only known in connection with, the perception we have
of this last.
If we open a work on physics or physiology we shall note with
astonishment how the above considerations are misunderstood. Observers
of nature who seek, and rightly, to give the maximum of exactness to
their observations, show that they are obsessed by one constant
prejudice: they mistrust sensation.
A great part of their efforts consists, by what they say, in reducing
the role of sensation to its fitting part in science; and the
invention of mechanical aids to observation is constantly held up as a
means of remedying the imperfection of our senses. In physics the
thermometer replaces the sensation of heat that our skin--our hand,
for example--experiences by the measurable elevation of a column of
mercury, and the scale-pan of a precise balance takes the place of the
vague sensation of trifling weights; in physiology a registering
apparatus replaces the sensation of the pulse which the doctor feels
with the end of his forefinger by a line on paper traced with
indelible ink, of which the duration and the intensity, as well as the
varied combinations of these two elements, can be measured line by
line.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account