The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911 — John Shaqi
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911Boas, Franz
Science
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911
Boas, Franz
Ethnopsychology; Race
We will now turn to the important subject of the size of the brain,
which seems to be the one anatomical feature which bears directly upon
the question at issue. It seems plausible that the greater the central
nervous system, the higher the faculty of the race, and the greater its
aptitude to mental achievements. Let us review the known facts. Two
methods are open for ascertaining the size of the central nervous
system,—the determination of the weight of the brain and that of the
capacity of the cranial cavity. The first of these methods is the one
which promises the most accurate results. Naturally, the number of
Europeans whose brain-weights have been taken is much larger than that
of individuals of other races. There are, however, sufficient data
available to establish beyond a doubt the fact that the brain-weight of
the whites is larger than that of most other races, particularly larger
than that of the negroes. That of the white male is about 1360 grams.
The investigations of cranial capacities are quite in accord with these
results. According to Topinard, the capacity of the skull of males of
the neolithic period in Europe is about 1560 cc. (44 cases); that of
modern Europeans is the same (347 cases); of the Mongoloid race, 1510
cc. (68 cases); of African negroes, 1405 cc. (83 cases); and of negroes
of the Pacific Ocean, 1460 cc. (46 cases). Here we have, therefore, a
decided difference in favor of the white race.
In interpreting these facts, we must ask, Does the increase in the size
of the brain prove an increase in faculty? This would seem highly
probable, and facts may be adduced which speak in favor of this
assumption. First among these is the relatively large size of the brain
among the higher animals, and the still larger size in man. Furthermore,
Manouvrier has measured the capacity of the skulls of thirty-five
eminent men. He found that they averaged 1665 cc. as compared to 1560
cc. general average, which was derived from 110 individuals. On the
other hand, he found that the cranial capacity of forty-five murderers
was 1580 cc., also superior to the general average. The same result has
been obtained through weighings of brains of eminent men. The brains of
thirty-four of these showed an average increase of 93 grams over the
average brain-weight of 1357 grams. Another fact which may be adduced in
favor of the theory that greater brains are accompanied by higher
faculty is that the heads of the best English students are larger than
those of the average class of students (Galton). The force of the
arguments furnished by these observations must, however, not be
overestimated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account