The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911Boas, Franz
Science
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911
Boas, Franz
Ethnopsychology; Race
Two problems may be distinguished here which have too often been
confounded in discussions of the mental characteristics of civilized man
and of primitive man. The one relates to the distinctions between races;
the other, to distinctions between the social strata of the same race.
According to the meaning of the terms “civilized” and “primitive,” it is
perfectly conceivable that there may be civilized groups belonging to
different races (like the Chinese and Europeans), and civilized as well
as primitive groups, both belonging to the same race (like the Yukaghir
of Siberia and the Chinese, or like the group of educated negroes in the
United States and the primitive tribes of the coasts of Africa). The
problems presented by the differences between the various races of man,
and by the differences between social groups in the same races, are, of
course, entirely distinct, and each requires separate treatment.
There is one peculiarity common to both problems, which must be
described before we can properly take up their treatment. When we
compare the individuals comprising any one racial or social type, we
find that they are not by any means uniform, but exhibit considerable
variation. When we try to think of a Norwegian and of a negro, two
entirely distinct types will be present to our minds,—the Norwegian,
tall, with blond and somewhat wavy hair, blue eyes, light complexion,
delicate face and nose; the negro, of medium stature, with black and
frizzly hair, dark eyes, dark skin, projecting jaw, and heavy flat nose.
Still, these pictures are only abstractions of what we think we have
noticed most commonly in each type. When we compare the Norwegians among
themselves, or the negroes among themselves, we find that each
individual in each series has his peculiarities, which the others do not
share. There are tall and short Norwegians; their hair is blond or dark,
straight or wavy; their eyes vary from brown to blue; their complexion
is light or dark, their faces more or less delicate. And so with the
negroes. The degree of blackness, the amount of projection of the chin,
the flatness of the nose,—all show very considerable variations.
Experience has demonstrated that in all cases of this kind, one certain
type, one certain combination of features, is most common; and that
deviations in either direction from this type become the rarer, the
greater their amount. Thus the Norwegians show a prevalence of a certain
blond color. Individuals with a color of hair much lighter than the most
common color are the rarer, the greater the difference of their
hair-color from the most common one; and in the same way individuals
with a color of hair much darker than the most common color are the
rarer, the greater the deviation of their color of hair from the common
one. The extent to which such variations occur is not always the same.
In some cases the individuals constituting the group show a remarkable
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account