The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911 — John Shaqi
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911Boas, Franz
Science
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911
Boas, Franz
Ethnopsychology; Race
We will first direct our attention to the differences between civilized
man and primitive man, both being members of the same race. For the
white race this difference can no longer be observed, because there are
no primitive white men in the strict sense of the term. Nevertheless we
may discover certain analogues. Some of the peasants in the remote
mountain districts of southeastern Europe do not live in a manner so
very different from the way of living of what we ordinarily call
primitive people; for the mode of life of the agricultural Indians of
North America at the time of Columbus, or that of some agricultural
negro tribes, is, so far as nutrition and occupation are concerned,
quite similar to theirs. Also some of the fishermen on the coast of
Europe may well be compared, in their mode of life, with the fishermen
of America or Asia. More direct comparisons may be made among the people
of eastern Asia, where we may contrast the cultured Chinese and the
primitive Amur River tribes, the northern Japanese and the Ainu, the
civilized Malay and the mountain tribes of Sumatra or the Philippines.
Similar comparisons are possible for the negro race when we contrast the
small educated class of negroes in America and the African tribesmen;
and for the American race when we compare the educated Indians,
particularly of Spanish America, and the tribes of the prairies and of
the virgin forests.
It is obvious that in all these cases we are comparing groups of the
same descent, but living in distinct economic, social, and other
environmental conditions. If we find differences among them, they can
only be due, directly or indirectly, to environment. Thus the
fundamental problem presents itself, In how far are human types stable,
in how far variable under the influences of environment?
It is difficult to take up this inquiry on the basis of a direct
comparison between primitive and civilized types belonging to the same
races, partly because material is hard to obtain, partly because the
homogeneity of the race is often open to doubt; but it is at once
apparent that every inquiry into the variability of human types living
under the effect of different types of environment will help us to gain
an insight into the question at issue, so that we are led to a more
general discussion of the problem of the stability or variability of the
form of the human body.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account