The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911Boas, Franz
Science
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911
Boas, Franz
Ethnopsychology; Race
The second group of causes which is most potent in developing distinct
races of domesticated animals—namely, conscious selection—has probably
never been very active in the races of man. We do not know of a single
case in which it can be shown that intermarriage between distinct types
of the same descent was prohibited; and whatever selection there may
have been in the development of primitive society seems to have been
rather that type of natural selection which encourages the mating of
like with like, or such intricate selection as is due to the social laws
of intermarriage, which prevented intermarriages of relatives of certain
grades, and often also of members of different generations. Thus a very
common form of marriage restriction brings it about that among certain
tribes the children of brother and sister intermarry, while the children
of brothers and the children of sisters are not allowed to intermarry.
Similar restrictions are found in great number, and may possibly have
had a certain selective effect, although their operation can hardly be
assumed to have had very marked results upon the form of the human body
(Pearson).
In some cases social laws have had the indirect effect of perpetuating
distinctions between separate parts of a population, or at least of
retarding their complete amalgamation. This is the case where laws of
endogamy relate to groups of distinct descent, and may be observed, for
instance, among the castes of Bengal, where the low castes are of the
characteristic South Indian type, while the highest castes preserve the
type of the tribes of northwestern India (Risley and Gait). The numerous
intermediate castes show, however, that the laws of endogamy, even where
they are as stringent as those of India, cannot prevent blood-mixture.
Whether or not in extreme cases endogamy in small groups, as among the
ancient Egyptians, has led to the development of well-defined types, is
a question that cannot be answered; but it is certain that none of these
types, when found in a large population, have survived.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account