The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911 — John Shaqi
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911Boas, Franz
Science
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911
Boas, Franz
Ethnopsychology; Race
I should like to repeat here that these results have not been obtained
with absolute certainty, and that it seems improbable that the laws of
heredity in regard to various ancestral traits are the same. I do not
enter into a discussion of the question of in how far these traits
follow the laws of Mendelian inheritance,—a question that cannot be
answered definitely at the present time (Davenport).
These problems have a fundamental importance for a clearer
interpretation of the conditions which prevail in the form of local
types of man.
In a large population which is as little stable in its habits as that of
modern Europe and modern America, the number of ancestors of a single
person increases very rapidly, the number of parents being two; of
grandparents, four; of great-grandparents, eight; the theoretical number
of ancestors twenty generations back would be over a million, or, more
accurately, 1,048,576. Twenty generations represent, according to the
rate of increase of modern times, about seven hundred years; according
to the rate of increase of older times, about four hundred years as a
minimum. These figures would apply to the series of generations
represented by first-born males; for first-born females the respective
numbers would be about five hundred years and three hundred and fifty
years. If we consider, however, the actual descent of families,
including individuals later born, we might perhaps assume that twenty
generations in Europe would represent from eight hundred to nine hundred
years, and among primitive peoples perhaps only little less, since in
former times the differences between the rapidity of successive
generations in Europe and among primitive peoples was not very great.
This makes it obvious that it is entirely impossible that as great a
number of ancestors as the theory requires can have contributed to the
development of the individuals of the present generation. The reason for
this is plain. Owing to intermarriages between the same families, large
numbers of ancestors will be duplicated in different paternal and
maternal lines; and in this way the real ancestry of each individual
appears to be much more complex than the purely arithmetical treatment
would suggest. The calculation for the ancestor table of the German
Emperor, for instance, is instructive. According to O. Lorenz, the
numbers of his ancestors in successive generations were as follows:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account