earlier and greater phase, while “Mycenæan” merely covers the latest
phase; the whole being designated “Ægean.” There is, to complete
the nomenclature, a further epithet, “Cycladic,” which is sometimes
substituted for “Minoan” when one speaks exclusively of the island
sites outside of Crete.
With the fall of Knossos, which took place shortly before 1400
B.C.--I adopt Dr. Burrows’s dating--the centre of influence in the
Ægean passed over from Crete to the mainland of Greece, and the true
“Mycenæan” period started. Thereafter followed the Dark Ages, which
themselves immediately preceded “historical” Greece. Recorded Greek
history begins about 800 B.C.
Chapter 3: _Minos and the Minotaur_
If the nine Minoan periods into which Sir Arthur Evans has divided
the Bronze Age in Crete are primarily a fanciful play upon the “nine
seasons” of King Minos’s reign in Knossos, the system of dating itself
is by no means fanciful. It rests on a solid basis. It has been made
possible mainly by the fact that the ancient Cretans were sea-farers.
Cretan products were exported to Egypt, and have been found there
alongside Egyptian deposits of more or less known date. Hence a system
of sequence-dating can be established. It is obvious that a Cretan
vase found side by side with an Egyptian vase of 2500 B.C. belongs
to an earlier period than one found with deposits of 1500 B.C. This
fixing of landmarks is the first step. The second is to assign to them
absolute dates in the terms of our own chronology. Owing to the fact
that Egyptian dates (within at least certain limits) are known in terms
of our own, and that Egyptian ware has been found in Crete as well as
Cretan in Egypt, equation is possible. The chief difficulty is that
Egyptian chronology is itself variously interpreted, and one particular
version has had to be fixed on for comparison. Three convenient and
easily-remembered landmarks have been established:
(_a_) Early Minoan II corresponds to Dynasty VI in the early Dynastic
Period of Egypt, circa 2500 B.C. As the evidence for this equation is
slight compared with that for the other two, it must be accepted with
reserve at present as a good working hypothesis.
(_b_) Middle Minoan II corresponds to Dynasties XII and XIII in the
Middle Kingdom of Egypt, circa 1900-1700 B.C.
(_c_) Late Minoan II corresponds to Dynasty XVIII in the New Empire of
Egypt, circa 1500 B.C.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account