[614] W. Cov., vol. ii. p. 244. There must have been many present who had seen three coronations before Henry’s accession--those of Richard in 1189 and 1195, and that of John in 1199. The _Ann. Dunst._, p. 57, mention a detail which would have a special significance for those who remembered Richard’s first crowning: “Judaei vero in Turri Lundoniarum servabantur interim ad cautelam.” Roger of Wendover, vol. iv. p. 63, says the crowning was at Canterbury, but he is certainly wrong. Cf. _Hist. Ducs_, p. 208, and R. Coggeshall, p. 187. T. Wykes, a. 1220, says: “Sane quia propter aetatis teneritudinem nondum sufficiens fuerat [rex] ad regni gubernaculum, totius regni proceres providebant sibi tutorem et custodem, virum summi discretionis et probitatis, dominum Hubertum de Burgo, qui motus regis voluntarios refraenaret, ne forte per immoderantiam lasciviret; factusque est justiciarius totius Angliae, ut sua prudentia, qua caeteris praepollebat, regis et regni negotia dispensaret.” And the Bermondsey Annals, a. 1220, say: “Hoc anno Hubertus de Burgo factus est justiciarius totius Angliae,” while the Waverley Annals make a like statement under the date 1219. These entries seem to be all derived from a common source, and based upon a mistake. There is superabundant documentary evidence that Hubert had been justiciar uninterruptedly ever since 1215; if he had not been reappointed at Henry’s accession, there could be no reason and no occasion for him to be reappointed now; and his own words in 1239, as given in the _Responsiones_, p. 64, distinctly imply that nothing of the kind had ever taken place. [615] _Close Rolls_, vol. i. pp. 170, 171, August, 1214. [616] See above, p. 117. [617] Before 4th Feb. 1215: _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 186 b. [618] Before 8th December, 1215: _ib._ p. 241. [619] The Archbishop’s appointment as seneschal is dated 28th March, 1217. _Pat. Rolls_, vol. i. p. 54. [620] _Ib._ p. 152, 8th May, 1218. [621] He was probably about the same age as Isabel, who was then twenty-six. His parents had been married in 1181; but his mother--who as the only child of the elder brother of Isabel’s father had claims on Angoulême--must have been then so young that her son is not likely to have been born till some years later. [622] Of Jerusalem and Cyprus. [623] _Foedera_, I. i. p. 159; _cf._ John’s treaty with the Lusignans, _Charter Rolls_, p. 197 b. [624] _Roy. Lett._, vol. i. pp. 30, 31. [625] _Ib._ pp. 37, 38. [626] She was proposing to go in July, 1217, _Pat. Rolls_, vol. i. p. 113, _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 315, but seems not to have actually gone till next year. [627] _Hist. Ducs_, p. 206. [628] _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 73 b. [629] _Ib._ p. 168 b. [630] _Roy. Lett._, vol. i. pp. 33, 34. [631] Such at least was Hugh’s story: “non poterat exire de Rupella sine commodatione praedictae pecuniae,” _ib._ p. 44. [632] _Ib._ pp. 43–45. [633] _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 395 b, 16th July.