The Miraculous Conception: Or, The Divinity of Jesus Christ Considered as the Foundation of the Christian ReligionAnnet, Peter
Religion
The Miraculous Conception: Or, The Divinity of Jesus Christ Considered as the Foundation of the Christian Religion
Annet, Peter
Immaculate Conception; Jesus Christ -- Divinity
We will begin with Matthew, because he is admitted to have been the
oldest writer.
Ver. 18. "Before they came together." It was necessary to premise this,
because their "coming together" was in no way disreputable according to
the custom of the Jews of that time. It was usual, when both the parties
were of mature age, for them to come together as soon as they were
espoused; if the woman became great with child, they were then married,
if otherwise, the espousement continued for a year, when the parties
were usually married; but it sometimes happened that they separated by
consent. Not having children being considered a curse.
Ver. 19. "Joseph was minded to put her away _privily_." In the former
verse it is said, "she was found with child of the Holy Ghost", here, it
seems, it was not suspected to be "of the Holy Ghost," but by a man, and
that too as a fraud upon Joseph, who was minded in consequence to put
her away. It follows, also, that Mary was unconscious that it was "of
the Holy Ghost" she was breeding, or we must suppose she would not have
failed to have told Joseph of so very important a circumstance; it is,
however, abundantly plain, she told him nothing about it.
"She was found with child." How found? her own confession. No such
thing; had that been the case, it would certainly have been mentioned;
and the angel which, in the next verse, came on purpose to announce it,
would, instead of announcing it, have come only to have confirmed her
account of her being with child, without having known man, and to say
how it happened. But, no; the angel comes not for any such purpose, but
to prevent her being put away when it had been discovered that she was
breeding. By what was she found to be with child. By her appearance? No;
in that case, "putting her away privily" would have been absurd? By her
friends? No; "putting her away privily" would in that case have been
equally absurd. It could then have been known to no one but her husband
Joseph, who finding himself imposed upon, was willing to hide his
shame by getting rid of her in the quietest way he could. But all this
happened "before they came together;" this assertion was made for the
open-mouthed, wide-throated, credulous, ignorant people, to whom this
Gospel was addressed, and for their successors, "who strain at a gnat,
and swallow a camel."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account