The Mirror of Taste, and Dramatic Censor, Vol. I, No. 3, March 1810
History
The Mirror of Taste, and Dramatic Censor, Vol. I, No. 3, March 1810
Drama -- Periodicals; Theater -- Periodicals
Produced by Louise Hope, Barbara Tozier, Bill Tozier and
the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net
[Transcriber’s Note:
This e-text includes characters that will only display in UTF-8
(Unicode) file encoding, including
œ (“oe” ligature)
and one or two Greek words.
If the apostrophes and quotation marks in this paragraph appear as
garbage, make sure your text reader’s “character set” or “file encoding”
is set to Unicode (UTF-8). You may also need to change the default font.
As a last resort, use the latin-1 version of the file instead.
The printed book contained the six Numbers of Volume I with their
appended plays. The Index originally appeared at the beginning of
the volume; it has been added to the end of the journal text,
before the play. Pages 189-268 refer to the present Number.
Errors are listed separately for the _Mirror of Taste_ and for the
_Novice of St. Mark’s_.]
THE MIRROR OF TASTE,
AND
DRAMATIC CENSOR.
Vol. I. MARCH 1810. No. 3.
HISTORY OF THE STAGE.
CHAPTER III.
SOPHOCLES--EURIPIDES--DIONYSIUS.
ÆSCHYLUS and SHAKSPEARE have each been styled the father of the drama
of his country: yet their claims to this distinction stand on very
different grounds. Æschylus laid the plan and foundation of the Grecian
tragedy and built upon it; but to his successor belongs the glory of
improving upon his invention. Shakspeare raised the drama of his country
at once to the utmost degree of perfection: succeeding poets have been
able to do nothing more than walk in the path trod by him, at an immense
distance, and endeavour to copy but without equalling his perfections.
The general admiration in which Æschylus was held, gave birth to a herd
of imitators, among whom were sons and nephews of his own; but as, like
most imitators, they could do little more than mimic his defects without
reaching his excellencies, they served only as a foil to set off the
lustre of his great successor Sophocles, who, while yet his scholar,
aspired to be his competitor, and gained the preeminence at the age of
twenty-five.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account