Thus the great fame of the Nazarene, which rests upon the idea not
that He was the incarnation of perfection but the Incarnation of God,
is sought to be preserved and appropriated by an eclectic modernism
which denies the very basis of His title to supreme distinction. Robert
Ingersoll and Thomas Paine are thought to have been a little crude
in some of their anti-religious tirades. But they addressed a people
that was at least familiar with its Bible. They never presupposed such
childish ignorance of history and scripture as is everywhere taken for
granted in “This Believing World.”
Browne, who naturally has small use for the Church of Rome, is
sympathetic towards such leaders of the Reformation as Wycliffe,
Huss, Luther, Zwingli and Calvin. But not even Protestantism wins his
unqualified approval. He says[158] that “Protestantism includes every
type of religious thought,” and “only slowly, and with many pangs” is
“shaking off the religion about Christ. Only slowly, very slowly, is it
beating its way back to the religion of Jesus.”
This seems like a fairly clear thesis, uttered by one who has never
read either the New Testament or the Old, and who consequently is
able to look upon Christianity, or “the religion of Jesus” (i.e., the
religion which he thinks was taught by Jesus), as an excellent system
of human morality of which he has heard good report, and holds that it
should not be confused with supernaturalism, or “the religion about
Christ,” of which he has heard bad and understands has been invented
somehow without historical warrant.
Were this all, I might pass him unmentioned. One cannot stop to
complain of every popular author who speaks without information. But
the total depravity of the Browne method of thinking, of argument, of
logic--to employ such words in his connection; the illimitable naïveté
with which he propounds mutually exclusive and antagonistic assumptions
in that agreeable and easy-flowing style of his, positively cries out
for remark. How he “gets by with it,” is more than I can understand.
“This Believing World” is logical only in two particulars. It follows
the same author’s short history of the Jews, entitled, “Stranger than
Fiction”; and it is dedicated to H. G. Wells. Such substance as it has
marks it as a less aureate branch sprung from Fraser’s “The Golden
Bough.”
“In the beginning,” it begins, after certain preliminaries--we are now
in fact on page 27,--“In the beginning was fear; and fear was in the
heart of man.... Boulders toppled and broke his bones; diseases ate his
flesh; death seemed ever ready to lay him low. And he, poor gibbering
half-ape nursing his wound in some draughty cave, could only tremble.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account