McDougall is nothing if not cautious. His subtile mind foresees every
objection which can be made, and tries to forestall it. The result is a
labyrinth in which even a professor, lacking a golden thread from the
head of Ariadne to guide him, must--and does--frequently get lost. And
yet all that this famous definition actually means is that we are born
in such a way that we act in such a way.
As to whether the way is marked by physical roads or by roads which
are something else; as to whether these roads are bequeathed to us
by our ancestors, or whether we just have them, McDougall does not
commit himself. But he implies that there is something in us which
pays attention or does not pay attention, and that this something does
not always follow a road even if it sees it. Sometimes it merely wants
to follow, but forbears. Each road, we learn as we continue to read
from this, his “Outline of Psychology,”[32] has a lure of its own--as
roads are apt to have--something which he calls the “hormic impulse,”
or “hormic faculty.” And sometimes, instead of having it always acting
from the roads themselves and moving us with a pull, he seems to
think of it as in or behind us and giving us a push. In its latter
position it can easily be mistaken for a will--even for a free will. To
experience an impulse to act, and then not to act as the impulse would
have you--is not that to be free to act as you like?
Yes; but what determines the like? Has the slave-driver gone, or has he
merely stepped into the background?
A hormic impulse is a “striving” impulse. We are born with these
impulses, therefore they are “instincts.” William James gave us
twenty-four--the instincts of climbing, imitation, emulation, rivalry,
pugnacity, anger, resentment, sympathy, hunting, fear, approbation,
acquisitiveness, kleptomania, constructiveness, play, curiosity,
sociability, shyness, cleanliness, modesty, shame, love, jealousy,
parental love. Dr. Watson says he has been able to find none of them.
Dr. McDougall rejects some and discovers several new ones, leaving
thirteen in all--which was for him an unlucky number.
Instead of being free, we have now thirteen masters, always wrangling
among themselves, it is true, but never consulting us about their
decisions. If we hesitate to obey one of them it is only because
some other happens for the moment to be stronger. Or we are mastered
by a combination; by a bloc. If we decide to move from the city to
the country, it is probably a farm bloc. According to this theory, a
sufficiently knowing person could calculate your conduct in advance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account