A Will must have power, else it cannot move at all. And it must have
the direction of that power, else it has no choice as to the way in
which it shall move. X, being an impulse and a desire, may be said to
have power. But McDougall puts it within an acquired striving trend,
and my dictionary tells me that a trend is an inclination to move in
a particular direction--which is precisely what an instinct is. The
channel, you will note, has already been dug. Whatever was acquired
was foredoomed to be acquired. The ideal of conduct which the “I”
formulated and accepted lay hidden from the first, with no possibility
of its being rejected in favor of some other ideal. The “balance sheet”
of the Law of Conservation has been retained, all protestations to the
contrary notwithstanding.
McDougall has also attempted to make a Will out of attention.
Now attention is probably the slightest piece of luggage of all our
inner impedimenta. It is such a little thing. It weighs almost nothing.
Can’t we get at least “attention” past the old-fashioned scientific
custom-house without paying duty under the Conservation law? This looks
at first like a feasible scheme. But the customsmen are lynx-eyed.
Once we submit to their jurisdiction they will let nothing pass, though
it weigh less than the tiniest bit of fuzz off the end of a feather
boa. Thus far McDougall has been held up as an undesirable citizen by
these hoary custodians, and not allowed to land in Mechanistia. They
have been alarmed by the suspicious manner of the traveler. But in
thinking that he has any free will hidden in his theoretical baggage
they are deceived.
This “interest” or “attention” with which we have to deal, is
“conative.”[40] And conation is “a convenient Latin word ... to denote
the striving aspect of the mental processes.”[41] I am afraid that it
is all it is, a convenient Latin word. For “instinct” too is a “direct
conative trend.”[42] Here we have two kinds of striving, only one of
which is said to be direct, that is to have a direction. But this
directed striving comes first; it is in-born, instinctive. Naturally so
is instinct, “a disposition which determines its possessor to perceive,
and to pay attention to, objects of a certain class.” But in trying to
find a Will it is precisely this determining which we are interested
in. We don’t care what makes the water run in the ditch, we want to
know what digs the ditch. In McDougall it is always instinct. He has
studied insects too much. He has seen too many lunatics whose wills
were paralyzed. “Instinctively” he gives us only the mechanisms which
he thinks he finds in grasshoppers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account