But as she seems to be an Austrian we must be content with the idea
that “the interpretation of the dream leads directly to a time in her
bodily development when she was dissatisfied with her shape.” She
wanted to be fat--an eminently Austrian thought. And from here we
are led to a yet earlier period. For the words “disgusting” and “bad
tone,” make it necessary, Freud informs us, to remember “how often in
allusions and in dreams the two small hemispheres of the ... body take
the place--as a substitute and as an antithesis--of the larger ones.”
That is, the piano was a dream disguise for the buttocks.
It now hardly seems necessary to remark that “the dreamer, owing to
a peculiar set of circumstances, may create for himself the right to
use anything whatever as a sexual symbol.”[73] Still less to add that,
generally speaking, “all elongated objects, sticks, tree-trunks and
umbrellas, all sharp weapons, knives, daggers and pikes,” are masculine
symbols; while “all little cases, boxes, caskets, closets and stoves”
have a feminine signification; or that “stairways, stairs, ladders
... or anything analogous to them” are to be regarded as specifically
erotic suggestions. And to make the system complete, whenever a symbol
refuses to fit in with the desired significance, we are at liberty to
regard it as “misplaced emphasis” due to distortion, and to interpret
it in an opposite sense. So pain may mean pleasure, and a crowd a
secret.
Nor is even this enough. He goes on and invents a veritable grammar
of dreams. Logical connection (in the latent content) is rendered (in
the manifest content) by simultaneousness; causation is expressed by
succession; “either--or” by “and--and” (you dream of both alternates as
being true); similarity or agreement is pictured by the concentration
of several images into a fantastic unity, etc., etc.
Freud commits the common and fatal error of proving too much. He should
have been warned by the fate of the late Ignatius Donnelly, once
Lieutenant-Governor of Minnesota. Donnelly, having shown that Bacon
wrote Shakespeare’s plays, went on to show that he also wrote Burton’s
“Anatomy of Melancholy” and Bunyan’s “Pilgrim’s Progress.” And having
discovered that these works had all a sort of sense when read from left
to right, proceeded to demonstrate (in “The Great Cryptogram”) that
they had an even better sense when read more or less from right to left.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account