Using the Freudian premises, we are forced to conclude that the average
child’s aversion to the multiplication table is a blind to cover his
unconscious but shamefaced eagerness for illegitimate parenthood. The
very name, “Multiplication,” gives us the key. Freud has met this
objection by saying that he does not permit himself to wander at random
over the field of conjecture, but is always guided by a principle. What
principle? That dreams come from suppressed erotic desires--the very
principle he is trying to prove. No, the court does not admit evidence
at random, it measures it by the supposition that the defendant is
guilty.
The Multiplication Table is quite admissible, for dreams are not the
only things which may be subjected to dream-analysis. Waking thoughts
are interpreted in the same way. If a patient refuses to dream,
the analyst pounces upon his inventions, his replies to questions.
The “Œdipus Tyrannus” of Sophocles and Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” fall
naturally into the dream category.
“We are far too much inclined to over-estimate the conscious character
of intellectual and artistic productions,” since “from communications
of some of the most highly productive persons, such as Goethe and
Helmholtz, we learn that the most essential and original parts in their
creations came to them in the form of inspirations and reached their
preceptions almost finished.”[74]
But though a dream can compose a “Hamlet” or an “Œdipus,” it cannot
compose a speech. “No matter how many speeches and answers may occur
in dreams, analysis always shows ... that the dream has only taken
... fragments of speeches which have been delivered or heard.”[75]
What, then, is this dreaming faculty which is at once so competent and
incompetent? Is it a gift, or a disease?
“A dream,” says Freud, in the Introductory Remarks to the book we
have been following, “is the first link in a chain of abnormal
psychic structures whose other links [are] the hysterical phobia, the
obsession, and the delusion.” Then on page 482 he declares, “The dream
is not a pathological phenomenon and does not leave behind [it] an
enfeeblement of the mental faculties.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account