That is the fundamental rule of the signal. Some roads have experimented
with other forms of indicators--disks of one sort or another, semaphore
blades that turn upwards rather than drop. The devices are numerous, but
the principle is the same. When the tracks begin to multiply, and the
signals begin to multiply in even greater proportion, they are generally
carried over the tracks on a light bridge construction--our English
cousins call it a "gantry"--and a series of small semaphore masts built up
from the bridge. One of these masts, or "dolls," will be assigned to each
track; and if there chances to be an unsignalled siding-track of little
importance passing under the bridge, it will have its own "doll" rising
from the bridge although quite devoid of semaphore blades. So it is all
quite as clear as print to the engineer, even when forty or fifty lights
blink at him from a single bridge. The signals tell their story to him
quite as simply as to the man in the tower, who is setting their blades in
accordance with his carefully arranged plans.
Where signals are not of this interlocking type, guarding some junction,
railroad grade crossing, draw-bridge or other point of possible danger,
they are likely to resolve themselves into the block system. This system,
in a rather crude form, with the use of operators at each block-tower or
way-station, has been in development for something less than thirty years
upon the American railroad. In brief, it divides a line--usually
double-tracked, but sometimes used by the so-called "staff" method upon a
single-track road--into sections, or blocks, of from three to five miles
each. On double-track under this system, no two trains, even though
travelling in the same direction are permitted in the same block. At the
entrance to each block stands a tall mast with two of the conventional
signal blades. The upper of these raised denotes that a train is still in
the block, and an engineer must stop his train and wait till it drops,
before he can proceed. The lower blade, when raised, indicates that a
train is in the second block ahead, and the engineer must proceed only
with caution and expecting to find that block closed against him. It is
all quite simple; and if the engineers followed the signals absolutely,
there never could be any rear-end collisions on lines protected by block
signals. As a matter of fact, there rarely ever are, although the
engineers do take chances time and time again.
"Why should I stop for that thing," said a veteran engineer on a fast
express train as we went whirring by one of those upper blades raised and
commanding us in a blood-red point of light to stop, "when I can look down
this straight stretch and see they're clear? Like as not something's got
into the mechanism of it and let her flop that way."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account