The modes of origin of lowest organisms: including a discussion of the experiments of M. PasteurBastian, H. Charlton
History
The modes of origin of lowest organisms: including a discussion of the experiments of M. Pasteur
Bastian, H. Charlton
Life -- Origin; Spontaneous generation
Although, therefore, there is a contradiction between the
unwarrantable and ill-begotten formula, “_omne vivum ex vivo_,” and
the doctrines of what has been called “Spontaneous Generation”; there
is no contradiction whatever between such doctrines and the only
generalization which we are really warranted in arriving at, to the
effect that _some representatives of every kind of organism are capable
of reproducing similar organisms_.
_Bacteria_, _Torulæ_, or other living things which may have been
evolved _de novo_, when so evolved, multiply and reproduce just as
freely as organisms that have been derived from parents.
The views as to the origin of _Bacteria_ and _Torulæ_ which are most
worthy of attention, may be thus enumerated:--
_a._ That they are independent organisms derived by fission or
gemmation from pre-existing _Bacteria_ and _Torulæ_.
_b._ That they represent subordinate stages in the life-history of
other organisms (fungi), from some portion of which they have derived
their origin, and into which they again tend to develop.
_c._ That they may have a heterogeneous mode of origin, owing to the
more complete individualization of minute particles of living matter
entering into the composition of higher organisms, both animal and
vegetal.
_d._ That they may arise _de novo_ in certain fluids containing organic
matter, independently of pre-existing living things (_Archebiosis_).
I shall make some remarks concerning each of these views, though the
evidence I have to adduce mainly concerns the possibility of the
origin of _Bacteria_ and _Torulæ_ in the way last alluded to, viz., by
_Archebiosis_.
The third mode of origin is what is called _Heterogenesis_; whilst
the first and second modes are the representatives of more familiar
processes, included under the head of _Homogenesis_. Thus, in
accordance with the first view, _Bacteria_ may be regarded as low
organisms having a distinct individuality of their own and multiplying
by a process of fission--thus affording instances of what I propose
to term _direct Homogenesis_. Whilst, in accordance with the second
view, _Bacteria_ are supposed to represent merely one stage in the
life-history of higher organisms, which are therefore reproduced by an
_indirect_ or cyclical process of _Homogenesis_.
The possible modes of origin of _Bacteria_ and _Torulæ_ may, therefore,
be tabulated as follows:--
Modes of origin { 1. Homogenesis. { _a._ Direct. of _Bacteria_ { _b._
Indirect. and { 2. Heterogenesis. _Torulæ_. { 3. Archebiosis.
I. HOMOGENETIC MODE OF ORIGIN OF BACTERIA AND TORULÆ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account