The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
Arabian authors, who were in a better position than we to know Greek
and Hindu mathematical literature, declare that the approximation
which makes π equal to the square root of 10, is of Hindu origin. It
is possible that the Hindu people, who were addicted more than any
other to numeral mysticism, sought to find in this approximation some
connection with the fact that man has ten fingers; and ten accordingly
is the basis of their numeral system.
Reviewing the achievements of the Hindus generally with respect to
the problem of the quadrature, we are brought to recognise that this
people, whose talents lay more in the line of arithmetical computation
than in the perception of spatial relations, accomplished as good as
nothing on the pure geometrical side of the problem, but that the merit
belongs to them of having carried the Archimedean method of computing π
several stages farther, and of having obtained in this way a much more
exact value for it—a circumstance that is explainable when we consider
that the Hindus are the inventors of our present system of numeral
notation, possessing which they easily outdid Archimedes, who employed
the awkward Greek system.
#Among the Chinese.#
With regard to the Chinese, this people operated in ancient times
with the Babylonian value for π, or 3; but possessed knowledge of
the approximate value of Archimedes at least since the end of the
sixth century. Besides this, there appears in a number of Chinese
mathematical treatises an approximate value peculiarly their own, in
which π = 3-7/50; a value, however, which notwithstanding it is written
in larger figures, is no better than that of Archimedes. Attempts at
the _constructive_ quadrature of the circle are not found among the
Chinese.
#Among the Arabs.#
Greater were the merits of the Arabians in the advancement and
development of mathematics; and especially in virtue of the fact that
they preserved from oblivion both Greek and Hindu mathematics, and
handed them down to the Christian countries of the West. The Arabians
expressly distinguished between the Archimedean approximate value and
the two Hindu values the square root of 10 and the ratio 62832 : 20000.
This distinction occurs also in Muhammed Ibn Musa Alchwarizmî, the
same scholar who in the beginning of the ninth century brought the
principles of our present system of numerical notation from India and
introduced the same into the Mohammedan world. The Arabians, however,
did not study the numerical quadrature of the circle only, but also
the constructive; as, for instance, Ibn Alhaitam, who lived in Egypt
about the year 1000 and whose treatise upon the squaring of the circle
is preserved in a Vatican codex, which has unfortunately not yet been
edited.
#In Christian times.#
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account