The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
Christian civilisation, to which we are now about to pass, produced up
to the second half of the fifteenth century extremely insignificant
results in mathematics. Even with regard to our present problem we have
but a single important work to mention; the work, namely, of Frankos
Von Lüttich, upon the squaring of the circle, published in six books,
but only preserved in fragments. The author, who lived in the first
half of the eleventh century, was probably a pupil of Pope Sylvester
II, himself a not inconsiderable mathematician for his time, and who
also wrote the most celebrated book on geometry of the period.
#Cardinal Nicolaus De Cusa.#
Greater interest came to be bestowed upon mathematics in general, but
especially on the problem of the quadrature of the circle, in the
second half of the fifteenth century, when the sciences again began
to revive. This interest was especially aroused by Cardinal Nicolaus
De Cusa, a man highly esteemed on account of his astronomical and
calendarial studies. He claimed to have discovered the quadrature
of the circle by the employment solely of compasses and ruler, and
thus attracted the attention of scholars to the now historic problem.
People believed the famous Cardinal, and marvelled at his wisdom,
until Regiomontanus, in letters which he wrote in 1464 and 1465 and
which were published in 1533, rigidly demonstrated that the Cardinal's
quadrature was incorrect. The construction of Cusa was as follows. The
radius of a circle is prolonged a distance equal to the side of the
inscribed square; the line thus obtained is taken as the diameter of a
second circle and in the latter an equilateral triangle is described;
then the perimeter of the latter is equal to the circumference of the
original circle. If this construction, which its inventor regarded as
exact, be considered as a construction of approximation, it will be
found to be more inexact even than the construction resulting from
the value π = 3-1/7. For by Cusa's method π would be from five to six
thousandths smaller than it really is.
#Bovillius and Orontius Finaeus.#
In the beginning of the sixteenth century a certain Bovillius appears,
who announced anew the construction of Cusa; meeting however with
no notice. But about the middle of the sixteenth century a book was
published which the scholars of the time at first received with
interest. It bore the proud title "De Rebus Mathematicis Hactenus
Desideratis." Its author, Orontius Finaeus, represented that he had
overcome all the difficulties that had ever stood in the way of
geometrical investigators; and incidentally he also communicated to the
world the "true quadrature" of the circle. His fame was short-lived.
For soon afterwards, in a book entitled "De Erratis Orontii," the
Portuguese Petrus Nonius demonstrated that Orontius's quadrature, like
most of his other professed discoveries, was incorrect.
#Simon Van Eyck.#
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account