The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
In what does the real nature of the copulation of these two pronuclei
consist? Does it consist in a fusion of the elements mentioned, or,
indeed, do the latter preserve their original independence and autonomy
in the midst of the new mixed nucleus, standing in juxtaposition
with and moving in and about one another? This is the question that
M. Maupas immediately proceeded to examine. The recent researches
of M. Ed. Van Beneden upon the internal mechanism of fecundation in
_Ascaris megalocephala_ are well known. We have published in the _Revue
Philosophique_, following M. Balbiani, a résumé of these important
investigations, and we may be permitted to reproduce here a few
passages therefrom; for nothing is more interesting than the evolution
followed by our ideas in that which concerns fecundation.
The notions that were formed of this phenomenon only took definite and
precise shape from the time when the existence of the two elements
of fecundation, the spermatozoön and the ovum, could be established.
It was at first believed that the spermatozoön impregnated the ovum
by the exercise of a purely physical action—an action of contact
and influence. But observation demonstrated that something more took
place, namely, an actual conjugation, a union, a blending of the
spermatozoön and the ovule. A further step was made in 1875, when
it was discovered, in studying the ova of Echinoderms, that but one
single part of the ovule, the germinative vesicle, conjugated with but
one part of the spermatozoön, namely the head, and that since these
two elements have each the value of a nucleus, fecundation consisted
in the conjugation of two nuclei. But there was still an element of
obscurity in this idea, simple as it was. If the nuclei were vesicles
like soap-bubbles they might burst, the one within the other; but
the nucleus contains a great number of differentiated elements, the
chromatic reticulated substance, the nuclear substance, the nucleoli,
etc.: what becomes of all these elements during the conjugation of
the two nuclei? In 1881, Flemming made a new advance in the question.
He determined more precisely the nature of the fusion of the two
pronuclei, establishing that it consisted in the blending of their
chromatic substances. This he observed in the ova of the Echinoderms.
According to the very recent works of M. Van Beneden upon _Ascaris
megalocephala_, the great nematoid of the horse, there is no fusion
whatever between the two pronuclei. They always remain distinct. Each
passes through, separately, all the phases of karyokinesis, when the
fecundated ovum divides. In this connection the recent observations of
M. Balbiani confirm the opinion of Van Beneden, who had been sharply
attacked by Carnoy and Zacharias. First, in each of the two pronuclei
each reticulate substance is observed to present the initial phases
of karyokinesis; the net-works form into a skein that contracts and
thickens; the ribbon-like body thus formed divides into two segments,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account