The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
Johannes Volkelt continues his review of Wilhelm Wundt’s “System of
Philosophy.” Prof. C. Schaarschmidt criticises Fouillée’s view of a
future metaphysics as based upon experience, from the Kantian standpoint.
Dr. E. König explains with sufficient strength the futility of Varnbüler
in his bold attempt of refuting Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason,” and Dr.
Paul Natorp, the editor, devotes an article to Prof. Clemens Baeumker’s
book “Das Problem der Materie in der Griechischen Philosophie,” in
which the author sets forth that the problem of matter is not a limited
problem, but the sum total of all those questions which have reference to
the existence of some cause of sensory phenomena which in its nature is
different from consciousness. The problems of psycho-physics and of the
theory of cognition are modern and were unknown to the ancients. Their
standpoint remained throughout that of realism. A résumé of the views of
Greek philosophers from Thales down to the New Platonists follows.
The leading article is devoted to Goethe’s relation to Spinoza and his
philosophical world-conception.
Goethe’s philosophical and religious opinions are naturally of the
greatest interest, because Goethe, the child of nature in the highest
sense of the word, represents a genius not such as our great contemporary
Cesare Lombroso conceives him to be, i. e. a species of the abnormal
man and a kind of insane person, but such as genius is conceived by the
layman, i. e. an abnormally normal man, a man whose excellencies lie in
a rare harmony of highly developed perfections—not in eccentricities.
Goethe’s eccentricities were not worse or more extended than those of
average people, but he had more sense, more humor, more depth, and more
spirit. Well, Goethe as a son of man and as a type of an unusually
perfect man was a poet, a philosopher, a scientist, an historian, an
artist, a man of the world, and a man of practical life, all in one, and
the opinions of this man in the religio-philosophical field show at least
that they accord with man as a child of nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account