The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
a total resignation. A partial resignation leads to the pessimistic
outcry “All is vanity,” yet the total resignation affords an inner peace
and produces that “air of peace,” _die Friedensluft_ as Goethe calls it,
which surrounds us when reading Spinoza.
One of Goethe’s maxims is quite Spinozistic. Goethe says (_Max. und Refl.
Abth._ v.): “He who declares himself to be free will feel himself at once
dependent but he who dares to declare himself dependent, feels himself
free.”
Goethe rejected the idea of a personal and transcendent Deity which was
urged so strongly upon him by Lavater. Rejecting Lavater’s view, he says
(_Wahrh. und Dicht._ xiv.): “I assured him in accord with my Realism
which is inborn as well as acquired that since it had pleased God and
Nature to make me as I am, I must remain so.” The expression “God and
Nature” savors strongly of Spinoza’s “Deus sive natura.”
According to Eckermann (_Gesp. m. G._ ii, p. 169) Holbach’s _Systéme de
la nature_ had also made a strong impression upon Goethe. Nevertheless
he was dissatisfied with the spirit of French materialism. He says: “How
empty and hollow is this sad atheistic twilight, in which the earth with
all its forms and the heaven with all its stars disappear. Matter only is
said to exist, being in motion from eternity to eternity, thus producing
to the right and to the left without further ado all the innumerable
phenomena of being.” Goethe’s view of “God and nature,” did not deny the
Deity as such, but identified both in the sense of Spinoza. In this sense
Goethe interpreted the sentence: _Qui deum amat conari not potest, ut
Deus ipsum contra amet—si homo id conaretur, cuperet ergo ut Deus quem
amat, non esset Deus_. The latter idea, “if a man wished that God should
love him in return, he would wish that God be not God” is a corollary
only to the impersonal conception of Spinoza’s non-anthropomorphised
Deity. We cannot and we must not think of God as a human being who like
a monarch makes favorites of those who are faithful not so much to the
divine laws of ethics but to God personally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account