The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
In his last chapter, entitled “The Intellectual Series,” M. de Roberty
continues his criticism of the views of Comte as to the law of the
evolution of philosophy. He shows that, so far from this being the most
general law of intellectual evolution, and therefore the supreme law of
all social phenomena, philosophy is only one of three intermediate terms,
the others being art and industry, by the aid of which the evolution
of scientific ideas acts on the ensemble of the social evolution. The
intellectual evolution is the direct consequence of the social fact, but
the social evolution is subject to the laws of intellectual evolution,
which embrace four great classes of conceptions, answering to the four
well recognised groups of facts known as science, philosophy, art, and
industry. We have here the same series of special evolutions as those
supposed by Comte, with the important change, however, marked by the
inversion of the first two members of the series. In this relation, the
author affirms that Comte’s law of the three states is false so far
as concerns the evolution of the sciences, and is of very secondary
importance as regards the evolution of philosophy and the two succeeding
evolutions.
The author concludes his work with a criticism intended to show that the
principal defects of Comte’s system arise from the confusion previously
insisted on in relation to the first terms of the intellectual series,
science and philosophy. That confusion is exhibited in the statement
that among the ancients philosophy was developed before science and art.
M. de Roberty, moreover, declares Comte’s theory that the industrial
development is the point of departure of modern civilisation, leads to
a complete subversion of the logical and historical. Instead of the
useful or the proper being, as that theory would require, the foundation
of the good and this, in its turn, the germ of the true, the true is
the foundation of the beautiful, and of the good and the useful. But
the true is more complex than supposed by Comte. It possesses at least
two aspects, science and philosophy, which may be really distinguished,
although the line which separates them is yet undetermined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account