The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
Sameness, accordingly, depends upon a special purpose. If in a chemical
combination a metal is wanted, it may be all the same whether we use
iron, zinc, lead, or gold. That is to say, it is all the same for
bringing about a special result; yet it is not all the same in other
respects. The weight and certain other qualities of the metals are
different, and also the cost.
SAMENESS AND MIND.
Sameness depending upon a special purpose, the question arises, Is there
any objective sameness in the world, or is sameness a mere subjective
addition to things? Is sameness something “real” or is it purely mental?
This is the old quarrel between the Nominalists and Realists among
the Schoolmen. It lies at the bottom of the problem of universals
and particulars, and we should say, it is only a special form of the
question, “Are relations objective qualities of existence or are they
products of the mind?” which was discussed in a former number (_The
Monist_, II, 2, pp. 240-42). The idea of sameness represents the most
important relation that exists; and if any relation is real, the relation
of sameness must be real also.
If sameness depends upon a special purpose, it appears that there can be
no sameness without that purpose; and the purpose being purely mental,
the sameness also would seem to be purely mental. But this is not so.
Sameness is an idea, and it is no exception to other ideas. All ideas
are mental symbols formed for a special purpose; but, being symbols of
something, ideas are representative of some reality, or of some feature
of a reality, or of some relation between two or several things. Every
idea stands for something; and this quality of the significance of ideas
is called their meaning or their import.
The question now is, How does the idea of sameness originate in the world
where, as we stated above, there is no absolute sameness, no identity?
Our answer is that sameness, not identity, is a general feature of this
world of reality, which impresses itself upon every mind from the very
beginning of the mind’s origin.
We can go farther in our statement and make it more emphatic: Mind
originates and grows only on the ground of the fact that sameness is a
feature of the world, and is recognised as such by feeling substance.
Two points or two congruent geometrical figures being in different places
are not identical. But they are of such a nature that, so far as regards
the purposes of geometry, one serves the purposes in question just as
well as the other, or one can be replaced by the other; and this quality
is called their sameness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account