The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
On the other hand suppose again that the stuff of which the world
consists were capable of acquiring feeling in some certain formation, and
that there were samenesses in the world and in the events of the world.
Would not mind necessarily originate in such a world? Given feeling
substance in a world of samenesses and differences, these samenesses will
produce analogous samenesses of impression upon the feeling substance,
which will be perceived as samenesses of feeling. The preservation of the
traces left in the feeling substance (supposing this substance to live
on indefinitely) will in the long run result in the formation of special
sense-organs. It will later on, with the aid of word-symbolism, lead to
the formation of universals, for universals are nothing but samenesses
perceived. It will then create with the assistance of abstraction the
realm of scientific thought, representing the uniformities of the events
of the world in exact formulas.
THE EXISTENCE OF SAMENESSES A FACT.
The question whether there are samenesses at all in the world, is in our
opinion settled. It is a fact that there are samenesses. The uniformities
of the world are a matter of indubitable experience—indubitable because
our very existence as thinking beings, as minds, is conditioned by this
fact. We see the mind of every child develop out of his perception of
samenesses. Our scientists teach us that the race-soul, like a great
immortal individual, is the product of the accumulated experience
of samenesses; and all future progress, in science as well as in
civilisation, in mechanical invention as well as in ethics, depends upon
the trustworthiness of the samenesses stated to exist in the objective
world.
The question of the ultimate _raison d’être_ of the samenesses and
differences, is another question; and it would lead us too far here
to discuss it. In several details the problem is not as yet ripe for
solution. A full solution of the problem would be tantamount to the
exposition of a complete knowledge of the world. Suffice it here to
say that we have reasons to think of the world-stuff as being of the
same nature throughout. The chemical elements seem to be different
configurations of one and the same substance. In this way all difference
would have to be explained as a difference of form.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account