The Monthly Review of Dental Surgery, No. VIII. October, 1880. Vol. I.: The Journal of the British Dental AssociationVarious
Science
The Monthly Review of Dental Surgery, No. VIII. October, 1880. Vol. I.: The Journal of the British Dental Association
Various
Dentistry -- Periodicals; Mouth -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Let us take some examples of what I mean. The upper jaw bone is the most
complex of all the bones of the face. Looking at its central part or
body we are first of all struck with the cavity in it—the antrum of
Highmore. Now, if you take a hundred bones, you will not be able to find
two antra exactly alike, but they will differ in size, in shape, in
depth, in width, and in size of their angles and inclination of each of
their walls. And all these peculiarities influence the countenance, and
must, therefore, be studied before you can hope to be successful in
replacing the lost dental organs. The high cheek bone of the Scotchman
is a very familiar example of the effect of a variation in the antrum.
The alveolar process.—The natural setting of the teeth varies also in
its depth, thickness, smoothness, irregularity, and most importantly in
its curve, which may be a broad, open semi-circle, or a narrow
semi-ellipse. The nasal process, too, varies as much in different
specimens; you will find differences in length, breadth, in the angle it
forms with the body of the bone, and with the frontal bones; all these
particulars modify the shape of the nose, and as I shall have to point
out to you, no feature is more worthy of your careful study than the
human nose in its numberless varieties. The malar process of this bone
has similar varieties. Notice again the palate plate how it differs in
breadth and arch, and so modifies importantly the roof of the mouth, to
which a denture has been adapted. The malar bones are unlike in
thickness, the size of their angles, length of their offspringing
processes, and in the exact mode of articulation with neighbouring
bones. See too, how frontal bones vary, in one case a broad, bold line
forehead, in another overhanging, in a third narrow and pointed, and you
meet with infinite varieties between these extremes.
In passing to the nasal bones, not only must we notice how they differ
in length and breadth, and the level of their edges, but that the shape
of their arch is constantly varying; it may be broad and rounded, or
narrow and high, even to sharpness. This depends upon the prominence
forward of the bony nasal septum, the interval between the nasal
processes of the upper maxilla, that is to be bridged over the breadth
of the nasal bones, and the exact mode of their articulation with the
upper jaw bone. Not alone does the usual arch differ thus, but most
obviously on the angle it forms with the frontal lines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account