The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races: With Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of Mankind — John Shaqi
The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races: With Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of MankindGobineau, Arthur, comte de
Philosophy
The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races: With Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of Mankind
Is the perfection to which the arts are carried, the test of
civilization? Then Bavaria and Italy are the most civilized countries.
Then are we far behind the Greeks in civilization. Or, are the useful
arts to carry the prize? Then the people showing the greatest mechanical
genius is the most civilized.
Are political institutions to be the test? Then the question, "Which is
the best government?" must first be decided. But the philosophic answer
would be: "That which is best adapted to the genius of the people, and
therefore best answers the purposes for which all government is
instituted." Those who believe in the abstract superiority of any
governmental theory, may be compared to the tailor who would finish some
beau-ideal of a coat, without taking his customer's measure. We could
afford to laugh at such theorists, were not their schemes so often
recorded in blood in the annals of the world. Besides, if this test be
admitted, no two could agree upon what was a civilized community. The
panegyrist of constitutional monarchy would call England the only
civilized country; the admirer of municipal liberty would point to the
Hanse towns of the Middle Ages, and their miserable relics, the present
free cities of Germany; the friend of sober republicanism would exclude
from the pale of civilization all but the United States and Switzerland;
the lover of pure democracy would contend that mankind had retrograded
since the time of Athens, and deplore that civilization was now confined
to some few rude mountain or nomadic tribes with few and simple wants;
finally, the defender of a paternal autocracy would sigh for the days of
Trajan or Marcus Aurelius, and hesitate whether, in our age, Austria or
Russia deserved the crown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account