The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races: With Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of MankindGobineau, Arthur, comte de
Philosophy
The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races: With Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of Mankind
"If species have a tendency to transformation, to pass one into
another, why has not time, which, in everything, effects all that
can happen, ended by disclosing, by betraying, by implying this
tendency.
"But time, they may tell me, is wanting. It is not wanting. It is
2000 years since Aristotle wrote, and we recognize in our day all
the animals which he describes; and we recognize them by the
characters which he assigns.... Cuvier states that the history of
the elephant is more exact in Aristotle than in Buffon. They bring
us every day from Egypt, the remains of animals which lived there
two or three thousand years ago--the ox, crocodiles, ibis, &c.
&c., which are the same as those of the present day. We have under
our eyes _human mummies_--the skeleton of that day is identical
with that of the Egyptian of our day."
(M. Flourens might have added that the mummies of the white and black
races show them to have been as distinct then as now, and that the
monumental drawings represent the different races more than a thousand
years further back.)
"Thus, then, through three thousand years, no species has
changed. An experiment which continues through three thousand
years, is not an experiment to be made--it is an experiment
_made_. Species do not change."[208]
_Permanence of type_, then, is the only test which he can adduce for the
designation of species, and he here comes back plainly to the position
we have taken. Let us now test the races of men by this rule. The white
Asiatic races, the Jew, the Arab, the Egyptian, the negro, at least, are
distinctly figured on the monuments of Egypt and Assyria, as distinct as
they are now, and _time_ and change of climate have not transformed any
one type into another. In whatever unexplored regions of the earth the
earliest voyagers have gone, they have found races equally well marked.
These races are all prolific _inter se_, and there is every reason to
believe that we here find the fourth and last degree of hybridity.
Whether the prolificacy is _unlimited_ between all the races or species
of men is still an unsettled point, and experiments have not yet been
fully and fairly made to determine the question. The dog and wolf become
sterile at the _third_. The dog and jackal at the fourth generation,
and who can tell whether the law of hybridity might not show itself in
man, after a longer succession of generations. There are no observations
yet of this kind in the human family. It is a common belief in our
Southern States, that mulattoes are less prolific, and attain a less
longevity than the parent stocks. I am convinced of the truth of this
remark, when applied to the mulatto from the strictly white and black
races, and I am equally convinced, from long personal observation, that
the _dark_-skinned European races, as Spaniards, Portuguese, Italians,
Basques, &c., mingle much more perfectly with the negroes than do fair
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account