The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races: With Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of MankindGobineau, Arthur, comte de
Philosophy
The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races: With Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of Mankind
It is necessary, then, to show what degeneracy is. This step in advance,
Mr. Gobineau attempts to make. He shows that each race is distinguished
by certain capabilities, which, if its civilizing genius is sufficiently
strong to enable it to assume a rank among the nations of the world,
determine the character of its social and political development. Like
the Phenicians, it may become the merchant and barterer of the world;
or, like the Greeks, the teacher of future generations; or, like the
Romans, the model-giver of laws and forms. Its part in the drama of
history may be an humble one or a proud, but it is always proportionate
to its powers. These powers, and the instincts or aspirations which
spring from them, never change as long as the race remains pure. They
progress and develop themselves, but never alter their nature. The
purposes of the race are always the same. It may arrive at great
perfection in the useful arts, but, without infiltration of a different
element, will never be distinguished for poetry, painting, sculpture,
etc.; and _vice versa_. Its nature may be belligerent, and it will
always find causes for quarrel; or it may be pacific, and then it will
manage to live at peace, or fall a prey to a neighbor.
In the same manner, the government of a race will be in accordance with
its instincts, and here I have the weighty authority of the author of
_Democracy in America_, in my favor, and the author's whom I am
illustrating. "A government," says De Tocqueville,[24] "retains its sway
over a great number of citizens, far less by the voluntary and rational
consent of the multitude, than by that _instinctive_, and, to a certain
extent, involuntary agreement, which results from similarity of
feelings, and resemblances of opinions. I will never admit that men
constitute a social body, simply because they obey the same head and the
same laws. A society can exist only when a great number of men consider
a great number of things in the same point of view; when they hold the
same opinions upon many subjects, and when the same occurrences suggest
the same thoughts and impressions to their minds." The laws and
government of a nation are always an accurate reflex of its manners and
modes of thinking. "If, at first, it would appear," says Mr. Gobineau,
"as if, in some cases, they were the production of some superior
individual intellect, like the great law-givers of antiquity; let the
facts be more carefully examined, and it will be found that the
law-giver--if wise and judicious--has contented himself with consulting
the genius of his nation, and giving a voice to the common sentiment.
If, on the contrary, he be a theorist like Draco, his system remains a
dead letter, soon to be superseded by the more judicious institutions of
a Solon who aims to give to his countrymen, not the best laws possible,
but the best he thinks them capable of receiving." It is a great and a
very general error to suppose that the sense of a nation will always
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account