Let us now turn to a much more fruitful objection. Suppose it be
objected that your action, though good when thus artificially isolated,
will in the concrete case have to be considered more broadly before any
final judgment can be pronounced on it. To this objection I fully
assent. It implies that although we have fully defined a hypothetical
case of goodness, we have so far simplified the conditions as to make
our conclusions inadequate to moral experience. Accepting this
qualification, it is now in order to complicate the situation; but
retaining our analysis {48} of the elementary process, and employing
terms in the meaning derived therefrom.
Let us suppose that the apple which you enjoy eating, is my apple, and
that I delight in keeping it for my own uses. Such being the case, we
fall to wrangling over it, and your appetite is like to go unappeased.
I now have evidence to show you that your act of violent appropriation
does not conduce to your interest. This is simply an experimental and
empirical fact. I am in a position to show you that the character of
your action is other than you supposed, that you were under a
misapprehension as to its goodness. It leads not to the enjoyable
activity which interests you, but to a series of bodily exertions and a
state of unfulfilled longing in which you have no interest at all.
Indeed your action is a hinderance to your interest; in other words, is
bad.
But I proceed to point out to you the further fact that, if you will
buy the apple and thus conciliate me, you may get rid of my
interference and proceed with your activity. Your purchase is now
justified in precisely the same manner as your original seizure of the
object. If you are asked why you do it, you may still reply, "Because
I like apples."
Now, it would accord with the customary use of terms to call such
action on your part _prudence_; and prudence is commonly regarded as a
virtue {49} or moral principle. But in prudence the meaning of
morality is as yet only partially realized; it is morality upon a
relatively low level. Hence it is desirable to avoid reading too much
into it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account