The Mormon puzzle, and how to solve it — John Shaqi
The Mormon puzzle, and how to solve itBeers, R. W.
History
The Mormon puzzle, and how to solve it
Beers, R. W.
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints -- Doctrines; Latter Day Saint churches -- Doctrines
The real causes, however, were the same ones that operated against them in
Missouri. The people in the neighborhood were jealous of the
rapidly-growing and flourishing city. They complained that their property
disappeared mysteriously, perhaps stolen by the adventurers and robbers
who had joined the Mormons just to commit such deeds under a cloak, and
for whose acts the Mormons, as a people, were not to blame. But the chief
reason was political. Smith began to agitate the question of a restitution
of the property they had unjustly lost in Missouri. He visited Washington
and had an interview with President Van Buren, who said: "Sir, your cause
is just, but I can do nothing for you."
The Mormons boasted that they had 100,000 in the faith throughout the
country and that their vote was a balancing power. They voted in a body on
all political questions. They even carried their arrogance so far in 1843
as to nominate Joseph Smith for President of the United States, and they
have always declared that if he had lived until the next election he would
have obtained that office. The Illinoisans, at any rate, believed that the
Mormons determined to rule their State and intended to set all laws at
defiance; and it was this belief that stirred their most bitter animosity;
but internal dissensions among the Mormons gave them an opportunity to rid
themselves of them in a most tragic way.
On account of troubles among dissenting Mormons, warrants were issued
against Smith and other Mormon leaders; but the constable who served the
warrants was driven out of Nauvoo. This act fired the smouldering hatred
of the Illinoisans into terrible activity. The county authorities called
out the militia to enforce the law. The Mormons hastily armed, and a civil
war seemed impending, when the governor asked the Smiths to surrender and
take their trial as the best means of satisfying the turbulent parties.
Now the charter of Nauvoo had been so cunningly devised that the State
authorities were almost excluded from jurisdiction within its limits; and
so the Smiths, feeling sure of an acquittal, obeyed the summons of the
governor. They and other Mormon leaders were then conducted to Carthage
and indicted for treason, and lodged in jail.
But on the 27th of June, 1844, an infuriated mob took matters in their own
hands, decided to administer justice after their own fashion, and attacked
the jail early in the morning. They broke down the doors of the rooms
where the prisoners were confined, and horribly massacred Joseph and his
brother Hyrum.
Now, those two persons were defenceless prisoners, and the Governor of the
State had pledged to them safe conduct to the jail and before the court.
Their murder was nothing else than _a most foul assassination_, the
gravity of which was augmented by the fact that it was perpetrated by
those who claimed to be upholders of law in contradistinction to the
Mormons, who (they said) desired to set law at defiance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account