The Mormons and the Theatre; or, The History of Theatricals in UtahLindsay, John S. (John Shanks)
Religion
The Mormons and the Theatre; or, The History of Theatricals in Utah
Lindsay, John S. (John Shanks)
Latter Day Saints; Theater -- Utah -- History
John Rogers was installed as the manager. He secured a very good
company for the opening, announcing a season of stock performances.
The house was opened on Christmas Eve, December 24th, 1894. The
personnel of the company was as follows: Jane Kennark, Blanche Bates,
Madge Carr Cook, Jean Coy, Howard Kyle, Tim Frawley, Charles King,
Harry Corson Clarke, H. D. Blackmore, Fred Fjaders, Mr. Mannery. The
opening play was "Moths." It was a good performance, and the company
made a very favorable impression. The axiom that "A new broom sweeps
well" had a number of exemplifications in this theatre. It was so with
this first company, notwithstanding it was a talented and capable one.
After it had been seen in a few plays, and the _novelty_ of the new
house, miscalled "The Grand," was over, business began to drop off and
it was more than the manager could do to keep ahead with the expensive
company he had.
Why this theatre was called "The Grand" we were never able to divine,
as it was at the opening positively severe in its plainness. There is
a great tendency in our country to buncombe, aside from the genuine
patriotism that exists in it; this tendency leads many of our fellow
citizens into silly extravagances, especially is this noticeable in
the naming of theatres, hotels and restaurants; more particularly is
this the case in the small towns. A man opens a little restaurant
scarcely big enough to accommodate a dozen persons, and everything in
it of the plainest and commonest kind, and he dubs it the "Palace"
restaurant. "Opera House" is a much abused appellation. Nearly every
insignificant, dingy, dismal, inconvenient, and homely theatre and
hall throughout the land is dubbed Opera House. It is a dreadful
misnomer--inconsistent and absurd in three-fourths of the houses to
which it is applied. "The Theatre" is dignified enough and much more
consistent and suitable. "The Grand" during the ten years of its
existence has had a checkered career. We doubt if any of its half
dozen different managers have made it pay. The first company, as
already stated, was found to be too expensive, the business would not
sustain the heavy salary list, not only was the salary list large, but
Mr. Frawley made a demand for a percentage of the receipts in
addition. This sprung a disagreement, and the company was after about
four or five weeks superseded by another less expensive. The Rogers
management was able, liberal and intent on giving the public
satisfaction. After a fair trial of the business, lasting three years,
they disposed of the house on a lease to Mr. Garvey of pageantry fame,
who spent a few hundred he had made on the "Pioneer Carnival" on the
house in the way of improvements, and then called it "The New Grand."
_Ad captandiun vulgas_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account