Great Britain. Parliament; Great Britain. Parliament -- History; Representative government and representation
[225] In 1792 a sample dagger was sent from France to a Birmingham
firm, who were asked to make 3000 more of similar pattern. They
thought the order suspicious, and consulted the Secretary of State.
Burke happened to call at the latter's office, saw the dagger there,
and borrowed it. During the Second Reading of the Aliens Bill he
hurled this weapon on to the floor of the House, exclaiming, "Let us
keep French principles from our heads, and French daggers from our
hearts!" The Commons were not impressed, and only laughed, while
Sheridan whispered to a neighbour, "The gentleman has brought us the
knife, but where is the fork?" Another attempt at dramatic effect,
equally unsuccessful, occurred on the second reading of the Reform
Bill in 1831. Lord Brougham spoke for four hours, fortified by
frequent draughts of mulled port. At the end he exclaimed, "By all the
ties that bind every one of us to our common order and our common
country, I solemnly adjure you--yea, on my bended knees, I supplicate
you--reject not this Bill!" With these words he fell upon his knees,
and remained in this attitude so long that his friends, fearing that
he was suffering as much from mulled port as emotion, picked him up
and replaced him on the Woolsack.
On July 1, Gladstone moved a resolution allowing members who could not
conscientiously take the oath to affirm, subject to any legal
liabilities they might incur, and on the following day Bradlaugh made
the necessary affirmation. The affair did not end here, however. The
legal authorities had been stirred up to investigate the judicial
aspect of the case, and decided that a man of Bradlaugh's opinions was
by law disqualified from affirming. He thus lost his seat, but was
promptly re-elected. Whereupon the House of Commons carried a
resolution that he be not permitted to go through the form of
repeating the words of the Oath, which, as far as Bradlaugh was
concerned, was an absolutely meaningless formality, and, in the
opinion of many, an act of sheer blasphemy.[226]
[226] Bradlaugh is not the only politician who has failed to interpret
the words of the Oath in too literal a sense. Walpole became possessed
of some treasonable letters written by William Shippen, a Jacobite and
violent opponent of his. Walpole sent for Shippen, and burnt the
incriminating papers in his presence. Later on, when Shippen was
taking the oath of allegiance in the Commons, Walpole, who stood near
and knew the other's principles to be as treasonable as ever, smiled.
"Egad! Robin," said Shippen, "that's hardly fair!"
When Bradlaugh next attempted to take his seat, a further resolution
was carried excluding him altogether from the House. He refused,
however, to acquiesce in this view of the situation, and, after giving
due notice of his intention to the Speaker, forced his way into the
House, whence he was removed with some difficulty by the
Sergeant-at-Arms and police.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account