Thus the cynic; and he is right as to the facts provided that he
does not exaggerate the extent of this thwarting and imprisoning of
ourselves by ourselves. It does not necessarily follow, however, that
basic cynicism towards life can be justified, however useful as a
stimulus to inquiry the cynical comment may be. Men are inconsistent
with themselves; they do obstruct their own steps, and they trip over
themselves. What, then? Shall we acquiesce in our blunders? Shall
we end our forward steps in pity or scorn of ourselves? Or, shall we
endeavor to understand what has happened, hoping that we may find a way
to master the obstructive self that is within ourself? It should be
interesting, at least, to inquire into the nature of this checking and
thwarting of man by himself, for, in spite of the obviousness and the
disagreeableness of the fact, it is relatively neglected by the very
institutions that assume as their function the making of men.
It is true that religionists, moralists, and educationists for many
generations have talked about an inner conflict of forces. It is
represented now as competition between instincts; then as a struggle
of reason with impulse; again, as a strain between egoistic and social
motives. Though there is obvious truth in these conceptions, they
do not touch several questions that must be answered before we can
secure firm control of our situation. These questions are: Why is our
performance so much below our capacity all along the line? Where and
how does the leakage of power occur? How have we become inured to our
own inconsistencies of conduct and of motive? What is the technic for
recognizing real alternatives for what they are? What is the method for
keeping a continuously open road for our wiser selves?
As far as I can see, neither our churches nor our schools are handling
with aggressive vigor these overwhelmingly pertinent questions. Exalted
capacities are, indeed, ascribed to man, and lofty ideals of conduct
are unceasingly mentioned, recommended, sung about, and prayed about;
but who offers a technic for getting these capacities to do their
proper work? and who really believes in the practicability of what he
says?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account