“You think you have shown that the feeling of disillusionment that
is spreading among us is a mood and a fashion rather than a rational
conviction; that the psychological evidence of our essential lowness
is weak; that our motivation is not a composite of instincts; that
in the evolutionary order, of which we are a part, desires as well
as structures evolve, so that the unprecedented in motives occurs
and is to be expected; that mind is marvellously plastic, and in
unconventional childhood is beautiful; that, under favorable school
conditions, creativeness bubbles up out of the commonplace; that after
the hot crucible of historical criticism has brought to the surface all
the dross of both great men and small, it reveals also precious gold;
that even within our selfish economic order high and fine strains of
desire can be seen, as if a god were struggling to create a superior
species through our mastery of natural resources. You find that, in
and through the complex that we call our motives there runs a demand
of personal-selves-in-the-making, a demand for mutual self-realization
in an order of reason, beauty, and good-will, in the creation of which
they are participants.
“All very soothing,” continues the cynic, “provided that you keep your
eyes straight ahead. But if you look to the right or the left of this
reasoning, this is what you see: In form, the argument defends the
dignity of life, but it does so only by picking out facts that shine
by contrast with our everyday conduct. Practically everything that has
been said includes or implies a protest against the ordinary run of
human motives, valuations, and habits. Thus, the passage from childhood
to adulthood is admitted to be a hardening process; it is admitted
that the capacities for creation occasionally displayed by the young
are generally thwarted, and that the very citadels of the spirit--the
home, the church, the school--are infected with the unspirituality of
our current economic standards and practices. It is made to appear,
further, that the economic order, which might and should have a main
part in the creation of man in cooperation with God, actually is an
enormous mechanism that subordinates men--capitalists and workers
alike--to a part, and the lower part, of their own motives, and these
largely misunderstood.
“You have proved that human nature contains factors that the current
disillusionment ignores or misrepresents, but you have shown also that
the actual exercise of men’s wills thwarts and imprisons the superior
motives that you are so concerned about.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account