The Movements and Habits of Climbing PlantsDarwin, Charles
Science
The Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants
Darwin, Charles
Climbing plants; Geotropism; Plants; Plants -- Irritability and movements
The chief or sole reason for the belief that the
curvature of a tendril when touched is due to rapid growth, seems to be
that tendrils lose their sensitiveness and power of movement after they
have grown to their full length; but this fact is intelligible, if we
bear in mind that all the functions of a tendril are adapted to drag up
the terminal growing shoot towards the light. Of what use would it be,
if an old and full-grown tendril, arising from the lower part of a shoot,
were to retain its power of clasping a support? This would be of no use;
and we have seen with tendrils so many instances of close adaptation and
of the economy of means, that we may feel assured that they would acquire
irritability and the power of clasping a support at the proper
age—namely, youth—and would not uselessly retain such power beyond the
proper age.
CHAPTER V.
HOOK AND ROOT-CLIMBERS.—CONCLUDING REMARKS.
Plants climbing by the aid of hooks, or merely scrambling over other
plants—Root-climbers, adhesive matter secreted by the rootlets—General
conclusions with respect to climbing plants, and the stages of their
development.
_Hook-Climbers_.—In my introductory remarks, I stated that, besides the
two first great classes of climbing plants, namely, those which twine
round a support, and those endowed with irritability enabling them to
seize hold of objects by means of their petioles or tendrils, there are
two other classes, hook-climbers and root-climbers. Many plants,
moreover, as Fritz Müller has remarked, {183} climb or scramble up
thickets in a still more simple fashion, without any special aid,
excepting that their leading shoots are generally long and flexible. It
may, however, be suspected from what follows, that these shoots in some
cases tend to avoid the light. The few hook-climbers which I have
observed, namely, _Galium aparine_, _Rubus australis_, and some climbing
Roses, exhibit no spontaneous revolving movement. If they had possessed
this power, and had been capable of twining, they would have been placed
in the class of Twiners; for some twiners are furnished with spines or
hooks, which aid them in their ascent. For instance, the Hop, which is a
twiner, has reflexed hooks as large as those of the _Galium_; some other
twiners have stiff reflexed hairs; and _Dipladenia_ has a circle of blunt
spines at the bases of its leaves. I have seen only one tendril-bearing
plant, namely, _Smilax aspera_, which is furnished with reflexed spines;
but this is the case with several branch-climbers in South Brazil and
Ceylon; and their branches graduate into true tendrils. Some few plants
apparently depend solely on their hooks for climbing, and yet do so
efficiently, as certain palms in the New and Old Worlds. Even some
climbing Roses will ascend the walls of a tall house, if covered with a
trellis. How this is effected I know not; for the young shoots of one
such Rose, when placed in a pot in a window, bent irregularly towards the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account