The Movements and Habits of Climbing PlantsDarwin, Charles
Science
The Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants
Darwin, Charles
Climbing plants; Geotropism; Plants; Plants -- Irritability and movements
SMILACEÆ.—_Smilax aspera_, var. _maculata_.—Aug. St.-Hilaire {118}
considers that the tendrils, which rise in pairs from the petiole, are
modified lateral leaflets; but Mohl (p. 41) ranks them as modified
stipules. These tendrils are from 1½ to 1¾ inches in length, are thin,
and have slightly curved, pointed extremities. They diverge a little
from each other, and stand at first nearly upright. When lightly rubbed
on either side, they slowly bend to that side, and subsequently become
straight again. The back or convex side when placed in contact with a
stick became just perceptibly curved in 1 hr. 20 m., but did not
completely surround it until 48 hrs. had elapsed; the concave side of
another became considerably curved in 2 hrs. and clasped a stick in 5
hrs. As the pairs of tendrils grow old, one tendril diverges more and
more from the other, and both slowly bend backwards and downwards, so
that after a time they project on the opposite side of the stem to that
from which they arise. They then still retain their sensitiveness, and
can clasp a support placed _behind_ the stem. Owing to this power, the
plant is able to ascend a thin upright stick. Ultimately the two
tendrils belonging to the same petiole, if they do not come into contact
with any object, loosely cross each other behind the stem, as at B, in
fig. 7. This movement of the tendrils towards and round the stem is, to
a certain extent, guided by their avoidance of the light; for when a
plant stood so that one of the two tendrils was compelled in thus slowly
moving to travel towards the light, and the other from the light, the
latter always moved, as I repeatedly observed, more quickly than its
fellow. The tendrils do not contract spirally in any case. Their chance
of finding a support depends on the growth of the plant, on the wind, and
on their own slow backward and downward movement, which, as we have just
seen, is guided, to a certain extent, by the avoidance of the light; for
neither the internodes nor the tendrils have any proper revolving
movement. From this latter circumstance, from the slow movements of the
tendrils after contact (though their sensitiveness is retained for an
unusual length of time), from their simple structure and shortness, this
plant is a less perfect climber than any other tendril-bearing species
observed by me. The plant whilst young and only a few inches in height,
does not produce any tendrils; and considering that it grows to only
about 8 feet in height, that the stem is zigzag and is furnished, as well
as the petioles, with spines, it is surprising that it should be provided
with tendrils, comparatively inefficient though these are. The plant
might have been left, one would have thought, to climb by the aid of its
spines alone, like our brambles. As, however, it belongs to a genus,
some of the species of which are furnished with much longer tendrils, we
may suspect that it possesses these organs solely from being descended
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account