Finally, neither of the Miss Pargents could throw the faintest glimmer
of light upon the affair. Their brother was not the type of man to
have secrets from his family. Both sisters appeared to know the inner
history of every moment of his life since infancy, and insisted upon
dispensing the knowledge at great length. As to his having an enemy in
the world, the thing was absurd. He was a very retiring man, who lived
only for his work, and had never sought adventure beyond the narrow
bounds of the family circle. Inspector Whyland came away from his last
interview with the sisters—for Miss Margaret had been prevailed upon
to come up to London—convinced that it would have been impossible for
the dead man to have embarked upon any clandestine enterprise without
the knowledge of one or other of them.
He was equally unsuccessful in finding any link between Richard
Pargent and any of the inhabitants of Praed Street. Their names were
utterly unfamiliar to either of the sisters, and Mr. Pargent’s only
connection with Praed Street appeared to be that he occasionally
passed along it in a bus. Inspector Whyland was convinced that the
same hand that had struck down Mr. Tovey, had killed Richard Pargent,
and probably Mr. Colburn, though the receipt of the counter was the
only link in the latter case. But what could be the motive for the
murder of these three men, so entirely disconnected from one another?
And, if one adopted the theory of a homicidal maniac, the difficulty
was scarcely diminished. Homicidal maniacs either kill indiscriminately,
or, as in the classic case of Jack the Ripper, they attack a certain
class or type. Yet the receipt of the numbered counters implied some
process of definite selection. Upon what possible grounds could such a
selection be based?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account