The Mysterious Box: Nuclear Science and ArtKeisch, Bernard
Science
The Mysterious Box: Nuclear Science and Art
Keisch, Bernard
Painting -- Radiography -- Juvenile literature
x
x
x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x x
x x x x x
x x x x x x
silver chromium zinc manganese iron cobalt
Known forgery
x
x
x x
x x
x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x x
x x x x x x
silver chromium zinc manganese iron cobalt
_Match the patterns of these lead white “fingerprints”. Unknown
painting A is_ not _a Rembrandt; it_ is _by the same forger who
painted the known forgery at the bottom. Unknown painting B is
either by Rembrandt, one of his fellow citizens, or one of his
students using the same paint._
“It was thought of many times by many people. But, it’s never been used
for identifying paintings. In 1964 in the Netherlands, two scientists,
named Houtman and Turkstra, analyzed about 40 different samples of lead
white, 20 of which came from Dutch and Flemish paintings. The rest were
samples of lead white not taken from paintings but obtained directly
from the manufacturers. They analyzed these samples for different
elements. These included silver, mercury, chromium, manganese, tin,
antimony, and a couple of others.
“They found that the concentrations of these elements in the lead white
from all the old Dutch and Flemish paintings were very similar. And the
trace element concentrations were quite different in the modern lead
white samples analyzed in the same way. At the time, they presumed that
it was because the lead white in the paintings was manufactured so long
ago. They may have been right to a certain extent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account