The Mysterious Box: Nuclear Science and Art — John Shaqi
The Mysterious Box: Nuclear Science and ArtKeisch, Bernard
Science
The Mysterious Box: Nuclear Science and Art
Keisch, Bernard
Painting -- Radiography -- Juvenile literature
There, on what looked like a small television screen, flashes of light
appeared that gradually formed a curve with many peaks and valleys.
After a few minutes the spectrometer was stopped and an electric
typewriter automatically typed out rows and columns of numbers.
The chemist explained, “This curve, which you see on the screen, is a
gamma-ray spectrum and tells us what elements are in the sample. The
typed-out data give us an accurate measure of the shape of the curve on
the screen. By measuring the gamma-rays’ energies we know what elements
in the sample were made radioactive. The height of each gamma-ray peak
tells us how much of that element is present in the sample.
“That gives us the information we need to calculate the concentrations
of the small quantities of materials in our samples. We can do this
because at the same time I irradiated a set of standards. Standards are
materials that are just like the samples except that they contain known
amounts of the impurities I am trying to measure.”
As the boys were leaving the laboratory, the chemist apologized for not
having enough time to explain the activation analysis procedure more
thoroughly, but he did give the boys a list of books to read on the
subject of radioactivity and radioisotopes.[2] They thanked him for his
help.
During the ride home, they discussed the paintings that were still
unproven.
“It’s too bad that the method of activation analysis fingerprinting
hasn’t been fully developed yet,” said Dad.
“Yes,” said Bill. “Then we could prove whether or not that last old
painting was really by Aelbert Cuyp as the expert from the gallery
believed. But what about those paintings that we found in the box that
were not so old?”
“Well,” said Dad, “if the activation analysis method were workable, we
might be able to prove if they were painted by Alfred Sisley. Meanwhile,
until the method is really developed we don’t know if we can do it that
way or not.”
“So what do we do now?” asked Martin.
“We’ll have to wait until scientists can thoroughly investigate this
method and several others that they’re working on.”
“Other methods!” exclaimed Bill. “What other methods?”
[Illustration: _“The Banks of the Oise”, a genuine painting by
Alfred Sisley._]
Other New Tools for Art Authentication
“There are several new tools that scientists are working on now,” said
Dad. “These involve methods that have been developed by scientists for
other purposes, but are now being explored for use in authenticating
works of art.
“For example, in Los Angeles, the county museum purchased an instrument
known as a Spark Source Mass Spectrometer. Like activation analysis,
this instrument will also measure small traces of impurities, but they
have just set that up and it will take them years to explore the use of
it for the type of problem we have been discussing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account