Politicians are interested in acquiring and holding power, in war
appliances and armies. They give some assistance in the development and
care of vegetables, fruits, trees, and the flora in general. They are also
interested in the development of all domesticated animals, the
preservation of the birds, forests and natural parks, the protection of
the fish. They have game-laws which are wise and whose results are
beneficial.
And the state hires and pays people to take care of all these interests.
It also hires and pays people who see that the laws are respected which
have been made for the protection and perpetuity of flora and fauna.
But as yet, lawmakers, politicians, reformers, and influential citizens
have not made provision for the development of citizens, except as the
institution of the school system assists in this work.
ENFORCED DEPENDENCE
_Thou givest man bread. Let my aim be to give man himself.--Froebel._
There was a time when women, like statesmen, were economically free. They
spun and wove, manufactured, planted, harvested, cooked. Land was cheap
and needs were few. The women gave a part of their time to the state in
rearing citizens, but they did not give all. They were self-supporting, in
great measure; therefore, self-respecting and capable.
But women lost their economic independence when industries were taken from
the home.
Farming, dairying, spinning, weaving, tailoring, laundering, baking,
dressmaking, millinery, building, carpentering, are all done on a big
scale, outside of the home, where the women, because they were mothers,
could not follow their industries.
Women are left with the dependent occupations of working for the state and
working for their husbands, for neither of which can they collect money.
Husbands' policy is: Where the treasury is, there will the wives' hearts
be also.
The welfare of the women who give their time--twenty-four hours of the
day, and for twenty-five or thirty years of their lives, their prime--for
the development of citizens has been left to chance.
The state has made no provision whereby potential citizens shall be
assured of the proper care.
The mother's time has been considered of no value, that is, her service is
not paid for in money.
If, in her youth, a woman married a man who was able to make money, she
might be assured of food, clothing and shelter for her children unless
or until Fortune frowned and the property was lost.
Any woman, whose husband dies, gives her time to the care of her children,
no matter how poorly equipped she may be to earn a living for them in the
world. She tries to do her own work, and besides that, what her husband
did--maintain the family.
The state has made no provision for the care of potential citizens whose
father has died, thereby cutting off the income which was once theirs.
We say that the purpose of the home is to develop children, that the home
is established for children.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account