The Myth of the "Manuscript Found," or the Absurdities of the "Spaulding Story": Eleventh Book of the Faith-promoting Series. Designed for the Instruction and Encouragement of Young Latter-day Saints.
History
The Myth of the "Manuscript Found," or the Absurdities of the "Spaulding Story": Eleventh Book of the Faith-promoting Series. Designed for the Instruction and Encouragement of Young Latter-day Saints.
Book of Mormon
"Hurlburt went east and was absent some two or three months--and
on his return publicly declared that _he could not obtain it_, but
instead brought several affidavits from persons who claimed to
have heard Solomon Spaulding read his 'Manuscript Found' in 1812,
and believed, as well as they could remember, that the matter and
story were the same as printed in the Book of Mormon. And these
were published in his book of 'Mormonism Exposed,' in that or the
subsequent year, but not a sentence from the 'Manuscript Found,'
which it appears that _he did really obtain_, but finding no
similarity between the two, suppressed the Spaulding manuscript,
while he publicly announced in his book that he had entirely
failed to obtain it. Hurlburt proved himself to be a man of gross
immorality and was untruthful and unreliable."
CHAPTER III.
THE BOGUS AFFIDAVIT.
The next noteworthy person who entered upon the crusade against
the Book of Mormon was a Congregationalist minister of Holliston,
Massachusetts, named Storrs.
This man was greatly annoyed at the loss of some of the best members of
his congregation through the preaching of the everlasting gospel, and
in his anger published to the world what he asserted was the affidavit
of the widow of Solomon Spaulding, but which she afterwards repudiated,
as shown from the following article published in the Quincy (Illinois)
_Whig_ shortly after the appearance of the bogus affidavit:
"A CUNNING DEVICE DETECTED.
"It will be recollected that a few months since an article appeared
in several of the papers, purporting to give an account of the
origin of the Book of Mormon. How far the writer of that piece has
effected his purposes, or what his purposes were in pursuing the
course he has, I shall not attempt to say at this time, but shall
call upon every candid man to judge in this matter for himself, and
shall content myself by presenting before the public the other side
of the question in the form of a letter, as follows:
"Copy of a letter written by Mr. John Haven, of Holliston,
Middlesey Co., Massachusetts, to his daughter, Elizabeth Haven, of
Quincy, Adams Co., Illinois.
"Your brother Jesse passed through Monson, where he saw Mrs.
Davison and her daughter, Mrs. McKinstry, and also Dr. Ely, and
spent several hours with them, during which time he asked them the
following questions, viz.:
Question.--'Did you, Mrs. Davison, write a letter to John Storrs,
giving an account of the origin of the Book of Mormon?'
Answer.--'I did not.'
Q.--'Did you sign your name to it?'
A.--'I did not, neither did I ever see the letter until I saw it in
the _Boston Recorder_, the letter was never brought to me to sign.'
Q.--'What agency had you in having this letter sent to Mr. Storrs?'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account