The natural and artificial disintegration of the elements: An address by Professor Sir Ernest RutherfordRutherford, Ernest
Science
The natural and artificial disintegration of the elements: An address by Professor Sir Ernest Rutherford
Rutherford, Ernest
Atoms; Chemical elements; Radioactivity
It has often been a matter of remark that the radioactive properties of
the "C" bodies seem to depend more on the atomic number, _i. e._, the
nuclear charge, than on the atomic weight. Confining our attention to
radium C and thorium C, which are best known, both have a nuclear charge
83, but the atomic mass of radium C is 214 and of thorium C 212. The
nucleus of radium C thus contains two protons and two electrons more
than that of thorium C. If it were supposed that the nuclei of these
elements consisted of a large number of charged units in ceaseless and
irregular motion, it is to be anticipated that the addition of the
protons and electrons to the complex structure would entirely alter the
nuclear arrangement and consequently its stability and mode of
transformation. On the other hand, we find that the modes of
transformation of these two nuclei have striking and unexpected points
of resemblance which are in entire disaccord with such a supposition. We
can, however, suggest a possible explanation of this anomaly by
supposing that the _α_ and _β_ particles which are liberated from these
elements are not built deep into the nuclear structure but exist as
_satellites_ of a central core which is common to both elements. These
satellites, if in motion, may be held in equilibrium by the attractive
forces arising from the core, and these forces would be the same for
both elements. On this view the manifestations of radioactivity are to
be ascribed not to the main core, but to the satellite distribution,
which must be somewhat different for the two elements although possibly
showing many points of similarity. It must be admitted that a theory of
this kind is highly speculative, but it does provide a useful working
hypothesis, not only to account for the similarity of the modes of
transformation of the two elements but also immediately suggests a
possible explanation of the liberation of a number of _α_ particles of
different ranges from the same element. There are two ways of regarding
this question. We may in the first place suppose that a certain amount
of surplus energy has to be liberated in the disintegration and that
this energy may be given to any one of a number of satellites. There
will be a certain probability that any particular particle will be given
this energy, and on this will depend the relative number of particles in
the different _α_ ray groups. The ultimate energy of ejection of an _α_
particle will depend on its position in the field of force surrounding
the inner core at the moment of its liberation. On the other hand, we
may suppose that the same _α_ particle is always ejected but that the
particle may occupy in the atom one of a number of "stationary"
positions analogous to the "stationary states" of the electrons in
Bohr's theory of the outer atom. This rests on the assumption that all
the atoms will not be identical in satellite structure but there will be
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account